ci: fix expression injection pattern in l10n workflow#2319
Conversation
Signed-off-by: El Mehdi Abenhazou <mehdiananas007@gmail.com>
Welcome to GitGitGadgetHi @XananasX7, and welcome to GitGitGadget, the GitHub App to send patch series to the Git mailing list from GitHub Pull Requests. Please make sure that either:
You can CC potential reviewers by adding a footer to the PR description with the following syntax: NOTE: DO NOT copy/paste your CC list from a previous GGG PR's description, Also, it is a good idea to review the commit messages one last time, as the Git project expects them in a quite specific form:
It is in general a good idea to await the automated test ("Checks") in this Pull Request before contributing the patches, e.g. to avoid trivial issues such as unportable code. Contributing the patchesBefore you can contribute the patches, your GitHub username needs to be added to the list of permitted users. Any already-permitted user can do that, by adding a comment to your PR of the form Both the person who commented An alternative is the channel Once on the list of permitted usernames, you can contribute the patches to the Git mailing list by adding a PR comment If you want to see what email(s) would be sent for a After you submit, GitGitGadget will respond with another comment that contains the link to the cover letter mail in the Git mailing list archive. Please make sure to monitor the discussion in that thread and to address comments and suggestions (while the comments and suggestions will be mirrored into the PR by GitGitGadget, you will still want to reply via mail). If you do not want to subscribe to the Git mailing list just to be able to respond to a mail, you can download the mbox from the Git mailing list archive (click the curl -g --user "<EMailAddress>:<Password>" \
--url "imaps://imap.gmail.com/INBOX" -T /path/to/raw.txtTo iterate on your change, i.e. send a revised patch or patch series, you will first want to (force-)push to the same branch. You probably also want to modify your Pull Request description (or title). It is a good idea to summarize the revision by adding something like this to the cover letter (read: by editing the first comment on the PR, i.e. the PR description): To send a new iteration, just add another PR comment with the contents: Need help?New contributors who want advice are encouraged to join git-mentoring@googlegroups.com, where volunteers who regularly contribute to Git are willing to answer newbie questions, give advice, or otherwise provide mentoring to interested contributors. You must join in order to post or view messages, but anyone can join. You may also be able to find help in real time in the developer IRC channel, |
|
Errors and warnings found by git-po-helper in workflow #9366: |
|
Thanks for the review. The git-po-helper warning about author vs committer email mismatch — I'll fix the commit authorship so both author and committer use the same email. The l10n workflow fix itself (moving |
|
There are issues in commit 66bca60:
|
|
There are issues in commit 66bca60:
|
|
There are issues in commit c261aa1:
|
|
@XananasX7 you're supposed to squash the fixups before submitting the patch. Also, you will want to avoid being ignored due to a commit message that is vastly different from existing ones. I suggest getting inspired by https://github.blog/2022-06-30-write-better-commits-build-better-projects/ to improve it, in particular with a strong focus on this part:
|
The
l10n.ymlworkflow injects GitHub Actions expressions directly into shellrunsteps:While these values happen to be hex SHAs, the pattern is flagged by security scanners (zizmor, actionlint) and violates GitHub's security hardening best practices.
Fix: move expressions into env vars and reference env vars in the shell script.
Ref: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-for-github-actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions#understanding-the-risk-of-script-injections