Skip to content

fix: correct dockerd storage driver parameter name#5825

Merged
JamesC1305 merged 1 commit intofirecracker-microvm:mainfrom
JamesC1305:fix-storage-driver
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

fix: correct dockerd storage driver parameter name#5825
JamesC1305 merged 1 commit intofirecracker-microvm:mainfrom
JamesC1305:fix-storage-driver

Conversation

@JamesC1305
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This fixes commit ce69352, where the dockerd parameter was incorrectly specified as --storage-engine. The correct parameter name is --storage-driver.

Changes

...

Reason

...

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following Developer
Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check
CONTRIBUTING.md.

PR Checklist

  • I have read and understand CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • I have run tools/devtool checkbuild --all to verify that the PR passes
    build checks on all supported architectures.
  • I have run tools/devtool checkstyle to verify that the PR passes the
    automated style checks.
  • I have described what is done in these changes, why they are needed, and
    how they are solving the problem in a clear and encompassing way.
  • I have updated any relevant documentation (both in code and in the docs)
    in the PR.
  • I have mentioned all user-facing changes in CHANGELOG.md.
  • If a specific issue led to this PR, this PR closes the issue.
  • When making API changes, I have followed the
    Runbook for Firecracker API changes.
  • I have tested all new and changed functionalities in unit tests and/or
    integration tests.
  • I have linked an issue to every new TODO.

  • This functionality cannot be added in rust-vmm.

This fixes commit ce69352, where the
dockerd parameter was incorrectly specified as `--storage-engine`. The
correct parameter name is `--storage-driver`.

Signed-off-by: James Curtis <jxcurtis@amazon.co.uk>
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 8, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.08%. Comparing base (ce69352) to head (d1743e8).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5825   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.08%   83.08%           
=======================================
  Files         275      275           
  Lines       29459    29459           
=======================================
  Hits        24476    24476           
  Misses       4983     4983           
Flag Coverage Δ
5.10-m5n.metal 83.41% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6a.metal 82.75% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6g.metal 79.99% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
5.10-m6i.metal 83.41% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7a.metal-48xl 82.74% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7g.metal 79.99% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m7i.metal-24xl 83.39% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7i.metal-48xl 83.39% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m8g.metal-24xl 79.99% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m8g.metal-48xl 79.99% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m8i.metal-48xl 83.39% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m8i.metal-96xl 83.39% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m5n.metal 83.44% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m6a.metal 82.77% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6g.metal 79.99% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
6.1-m6i.metal 83.44% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m7a.metal-48xl 82.76% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m7g.metal 79.99% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
6.1-m7i.metal-24xl 83.45% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m7i.metal-48xl 83.45% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m8g.metal-24xl 79.99% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m8g.metal-48xl 79.99% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m8i.metal-48xl 83.46% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m8i.metal-96xl 83.46% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@JamesC1305 JamesC1305 merged commit 0ccc9e8 into firecracker-microvm:main Apr 9, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants