Skip to content

Add job identifier to FeatureRow - #147

Merged
feast-ci-bot merged 3 commits into
feast-dev:masterfrom
mansiib:add-jobid
Mar 3, 2019
Merged

Add job identifier to FeatureRow #147
feast-ci-bot merged 3 commits into
feast-dev:masterfrom
mansiib:add-jobid

Conversation

@mansiib

@mansiib mansiib commented Mar 1, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Issue #145

@zhilingc

zhilingc commented Mar 1, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/approve

@feast-ci-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: zhilingc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tims

tims commented Mar 1, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Does the job id get set by core when it starts the job? if not it wont match Beam's notion of a job name.

@zhilingc

zhilingc commented Mar 1, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tims It's slightly confusing, but the Feast definition of job id is actually the job name (not the job id) and is what we return to the user when they run a job; we map it to the runner's job id internally. Since this will be written to BQ, which is external, it makes sense to use this instead of the runner job id.

@tims

tims commented Mar 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I meant, is the jobId being set as the job name in when you start the runner? I thought it wasn't based on conversations, but it seems that it is:

https://github.com/gojek/feast/blob/c525845b05d73e8ec10511b93c34f3105ae438b8/core/src/main/java/feast/core/job/direct/DirectRunnerJobManager.java#L81

@tims

tims commented Mar 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@zhilingc

zhilingc commented Mar 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tims If the user sets it from the API it will be the user provided value, if not ingestion will generate one.

@zhilingc

zhilingc commented Mar 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mansiib you probably want to merge in the changes you made in PR #146

@tims

tims commented Mar 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tims If the user sets it from the API it will be the user provided value, if not ingestion will generate one.

That's why I asked

@zhilingc

zhilingc commented Mar 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tims If the user sets it from the API it will be the user provided value, if not ingestion will generate one.

That's why I asked

Oh right. Sorry, I can't read apparently. haha. It does, as you've already found out.

@feast-ci-bot feast-ci-bot removed the lgtm label Mar 2, 2019
@zhilingc

zhilingc commented Mar 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/retest

@zhilingc

zhilingc commented Mar 3, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/lgtm

@feast-ci-bot
feast-ci-bot merged commit 0a89bd6 into feast-dev:master Mar 3, 2019
@feast-ci-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mansiib: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
presubmit-unit-tests 21db33c link /test presubmit-unit-tests
Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

aniketpalu pushed a commit to aniketpalu/feast that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2025
Signed-off-by: konflux-internal-p02 <170854209+konflux-internal-p02[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: konflux-internal-p02[bot] <170854209+konflux-internal-p02[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
aniketpalu pushed a commit to aniketpalu/feast that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2025
Signed-off-by: konflux-internal-p02 <170854209+konflux-internal-p02[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: konflux-internal-p02[bot] <170854209+konflux-internal-p02[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Vperiodt pushed a commit to Vperiodt/feast that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2026
test: Add Post Upgrade Scenarios registry data and materialization validation
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants