Skip to content

Add unit test for historical retrieval with panda dataframe - #1073

Merged
feast-ci-bot merged 1 commit into
feast-dev:masterfrom
khorshuheng:fix-panda-entity-source
Oct 22, 2020
Merged

Add unit test for historical retrieval with panda dataframe#1073
feast-ci-bot merged 1 commit into
feast-dev:masterfrom
khorshuheng:fix-panda-entity-source

Conversation

@khorshuheng

@khorshuheng khorshuheng commented Oct 20, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Signed-off-by: Khor Shu Heng khor.heng@gojek.com

What this PR does / why we need it:
There is currently no unit test for cases where the input to the historical feature retrieval output is a panda dataframe. This PR add the test.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:


@feast-ci-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: khorshuheng, pyalex

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@khorshuheng
khorshuheng force-pushed the fix-panda-entity-source branch from 10f17d4 to a0cd6fb Compare October 21, 2020 05:38
Signed-off-by: Khor Shu Heng <khor.heng@gojek.com>
@khorshuheng
khorshuheng force-pushed the fix-panda-entity-source branch from a0cd6fb to 5fab886 Compare October 21, 2020 05:40
@khorshuheng khorshuheng changed the title Fix file source url and schema when using dataframe as feature retrieval input Add unit test for historical retrieval with panda dataframe Oct 21, 2020
@pyalex

pyalex commented Oct 22, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/lgtm

@feast-ci-bot
feast-ci-bot merged commit 4141cd0 into feast-dev:master Oct 22, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants