Skip to content

[Docs]: Cleanup, Push to site, and Spell check - #2776

Merged
J08K merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
J08K-Docs
Nov 15, 2021
Merged

[Docs]: Cleanup, Push to site, and Spell check#2776
J08K merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
J08K-Docs

Conversation

@J08K

@J08K J08K commented Nov 15, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This would fix both #2721 and #2726. Also I cleaned up the docs a little bit and fixed some weird stuff and did a spell check.

@J08K
J08K requested a review from BethanyG November 15, 2021 15:30
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi & Welcome! 👋🏽 👋

Thank you for contributing to exercism/python 💛 💙 -- we really appreciate it! 🌟 🌈


This is an automated [🤖 🤖  ] comment for the maintainers of this repository, notifying them of your contribution. 🎉
Someone will review/reply to your changes shortly. (usually within 72 hours.)
You can safely ignore the maintainers section below.


⚠️  Please be aware ⚠️

     This repo does not generally accept []Pull Requests](https://github.com/exercism/docs/blob/main/community/good-member/pull-requests.md) unless they follow our contributing guidelines and are:

     1️⃣     Small, contained fixes for typos/grammar/punctuation/code syntax on [one] exercise,
     2️⃣     Medium changes that have been agreed/discussed via a filed issue,
     3️⃣     Contributions from our [help wanted][help-wanted] issue list,
     4️⃣     Larger (previously agreed-upon) contributions from recent & regular (within the last 6 months) contributors.

    Pull Requests not in these categories will be closed. 😞


🛠️    Maintainers   

Please take note 📒 of the following sections/review items 👀 ✨



🌈  Acknowledgements and Reputation
  • ❓ Does this PR need to receive a label with a reputation modifier?
    • medium is awarded by default.
  • ❓ Does this contributor need to be added to the exercise authors or contributors?
  • ❓ Does this contributor need to be added to the concept authors or contributors?
  • ❓ Is there an associated issue or issues that should be linked to this PR?
💫  General Code Quality

    Verify:

    •  The branch was updated & rebased with any (recent) upstream changes.
    •  All prose was checked for spelling and grammar.
    •  Files are formatted via yapf (yapf config) & conform to our coding standards
    •  Files pass flake8 with flake8 config & pylint with pylint config.
    •  Changed example.py/exemplar.py files still pass their associated test files.
    •  Changed test files still work with associated example.py/exemplar.py files.
      • Check that tests fail properly, as well as succeed.
        (e.g., make some tests fail on purpose to "test the tests" & failure messages).
    •  All files have proper EOL.
    •  If a JinJa2 template was modified/created, was the test file regenerated?
      • Does the regenerated test file successfully test the exercises example.py file?
    •  The branch passes all CI checks & configlet-lint.


🌿  Changes to Concept Exercises
  • ❓ Are all required files still up-to-date & configured correctly for this change?_
  • ❓ Does <exercise>/.meta/design.md need to be updated with new implementation/design decisions
  • ❓ Do these changes require follow-on/supporting changes to related concept documents?
    ✨  Where applicable, check the following ✨

      (as a reminder: Concept Exercise Anatomy)

      • Exercise introduction.md
        • Do all code examples compile, run, and return the shown output?
        • Are all the code examples formatted per the Python docs?
      • Exercise instructions.md
      • Exercise hints.md
      • Check that exercise design.md was fulfilled or edited appropriately
      • Exercise exemplar.py
        • Only uses syntax previously introduced or explained.
        • Is correct and appropriate for the exercise and story.
      • Exercise <exercise_name>.py (stub)
        • Includes appropriate docstrings and function names.
        • Includes pass for each function
        • Includes an EOL at the end
      • Exercise <exercise_name>_test.py
        • Tests cover all (reasonable) inputs and scenarios
        • At least one test for each task in the exercise
        • If using subtests or fixtures they're formatted correctly for the runner
        • Classnames are <ExerciseName>Test
        • Test functions are test_<test_name>
      • Exercise config.json --> valid UUID4
      • Corresponding concept introduction.md
      • Corresponding concept about.md
      • Concept config.json
      • All Markdown Files : Prettier linting (for all markdown docs)
      • All Code files: PyLint linting (except for test files)
      • All files with text: Spell check & grammar review.
🚀  Changes to Practice Exercises

    Is the exercise is in line with Practice Exercise Anatomy?

    • .docs/instructions.md(required)
      • Was this file updated and regenerated properly?
    • .docs/introduction.md(optional)
    • .docs/introduction.append.md(optional)
    • .docs/instructions.append.md (optional)
      • Are any additional instructions needed/provided?
         (e.g. error handling or information on classes)
    • .docs/hints.md(optional)
      • Was this file regenerated properly?
    • .meta/config.json (required)
    • .meta/example.py (required)
      • Does this pass all the current tests as written/generated?
    • .meta/design.md (optional)
    • .meta/template.j2 (template for generating tests from canonical data)
      • Was a test file properly regenerated from this template?
    • .meta/tests.toml
      • Are there additional test cases to include or exclude?
      • Are there any Python-specific test cases needed for this exercise?
    • <exercise-slug>_test.py
      • Does this file need to be regenerated?
      • Does this file correctly test the example.py file?
      • Does this file correctly report test failures and messages?
    • <exercise-slug>.py (required)
      • Does this stub have enough information to get
         the student started coding a valid solution?
🐣  Brand-New Concept Exercises

    Is the exercise is in line with Concept Exercise Anatomy?

    • Exercise introduction.md
      • Do all code examples compile, run, and return the shown output?
      • Are all the code examples formatted per the Python docs?
    • Exercise instructions.md
    • Exercise hints.md
    • Check that exercise design.md was fulfilled or edited appropriately
    • Exercise exemplar.py
      • Only uses syntax previously introduced or explained.
      • Is correct and appropriate for the exercise and story.
    • Exercise <exercise_name>.py (stub)
      • Includes appropriate docstrings and function names.
      • Includes pass for each function
      • Includes an EOL at the end
    • Exercise <exercise_name>_test.py
      • Tests cover all (reasonable) inputs and scenarios
      • At least one test for each task in the exercise
      • If using subtests or fixtures they're formatted correctly for the runner
      • Classnames are <ExerciseName>Test
      • Test functions are test_<test_name>
    • Exercise config.json --> valid UUID4
    • Corresponding concept introduction.md
    • Corresponding concept about.md
    • Concept config.json
    • All Markdown Files : Prettier linting (for all markdown docs)
    • All Code files: Flake8 & PyLint linting
    • All Code Examples: proper formatting and fencing. Verify they run in the REPL
    • All files with text: Spell check & grammar review.


Our   💖   for all your review efforts! 🌟 🦄

* Add intro and a few suggestions.

* Update docs/TESTS.md

Co-authored-by: Job van der Wal <48634934+J08K@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: Job van der Wal <48634934+J08K@users.noreply.github.com>

@BethanyG BethanyG left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work! Thank you for this. 🌟 🌈

@J08K
J08K merged commit c596faf into main Nov 15, 2021
@J08K
J08K deleted the J08K-Docs branch November 15, 2021 17:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants