Skip to content

Changed order of boards in boards.txt and boards.txt.py#7625

Closed
bonnom wants to merge 2 commits into
esp8266:masterfrom
bonnom:master
Closed

Changed order of boards in boards.txt and boards.txt.py#7625
bonnom wants to merge 2 commits into
esp8266:masterfrom
bonnom:master

Conversation

@bonnom
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bonnom bonnom commented Oct 2, 2020

The order of board names was a giant mess. The order is now first generic esp8266 and esp8285, followed by all other boards sorted in alphabetical order.

bonnom added 2 commits October 2, 2020 21:24
The order of board names was a giant mess. The order is now first generic esp8266 and esp8285, followed by all other boards sorted in alphabetical order.
The order of board names was a giant mess. The order is now first generic esp8266 and esp8285, followed by all other boards sorted in alphabetical order.
@bonnom
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

bonnom commented Oct 2, 2020

I don't know why boards.txt failed. I generated the boards.txt on my own computer with python.

@earlephilhower
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

You need to regen the boards.txt using any changes you've made to boards.txt.py and make it part of the commit.

You also need to make sure that any changes you've made are stable (i.e. don't rely on unguaranteed ordering of Python lists/maps/etc.).

At a higher level, why are you suggesting this reordering? The two files are only machine read and not for human consumption...

@earlephilhower earlephilhower added the waiting for feedback Waiting on additional info. If it's not received, the issue may be closed. label Oct 9, 2020
@earlephilhower
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Closing due to build errors and lack of feedback. If you have an update and can explain the reasoning for doing this, please drop a note here and we can reopen it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

waiting for feedback Waiting on additional info. If it's not received, the issue may be closed.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants