[Finishes #101465756, #101453700] Chrome-less share for App Lab#4280
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[Finishes #104218742]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hah. I'd gone back and forth on using # vs. javascript:void(0). I thought I saw SO answer saying # was better, but it's been problematic in various ways. I wonder if we should be doing a broader cleanup of these.
|
Pretty cool. Lgtm |
|
Hey Josh, is the asset not sized quite correctly? Ideally we don't have the Let me know if so and i can tweak. On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Bjvanminnen notifications@github.com
|
|
Also (this looks so cool, btw!) can we push the phone down by 50 pixels so On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Sarah Filman sarah.filman@code.org wrote:
|
[Finishes #103531916, #101453700] Chrome-less share for App Lab
This change implements chrome-less App Lab share per @sfilman's spec.
On mobile, chrome-less share shows no Run or Reset button. The app takes up the full width of the phone, with space left at the bottom (due to the aspect ratio).
On desktop, chrome-less share shows no Run or Reset button. The app is framed by a phone wireframe mock.