Fix project item-add output for non-TTY - #14056
Open
zwick wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
zwick
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 3, 2026 18:52
zwick
requested review from
Copilot and
tidy-dev
and removed request for
Copilot
August 3, 2026 18:52
Contributor
|
Thanks for your pull request! Unfortunately, it doesn't meet the requirements for review:
Please update your PR to address the above. This PR will be automatically closed in 4 days if these requirements are not met. Full contribution requirements
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #14055
Description
gh project item-addemitted no output when stdout was not a TTY. It now prints the created ProjectV2 item ID, while preservingAdded itemfor TTY output and existing--formatoutput.How did you test this change?
go test ./pkg/cmd/project/item-add -run 'Test(PrintResults|RunAddItem_JSON)$'Result:
ok github.com/cli/cli/v2/pkg/cmd/project/item-addKey points
The existing mutation result supplies the item ID, so this adds no API requests.
Notes for reviewers
The change is limited to output selection and focused regression coverage.
Authorship and follow-up
Who wrote this:
Who answers review comments: