Updated the require section to reflect issue 11198#11206
Conversation
To make things less confusing, explicitly state that require WILL NOT cause a compile error if a link function is not specified. #11198 stackoverflow.com/questions/28730346/require-ddo-option-of-angular-directive-does-not-throw-an-error-when-it-should
|
Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project, in which case you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) at https://cla.developers.google.com/. If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check the information on your CLA or see this help article on setting the email on your git commits. Once you've done that, please reply here to let us know. If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please let us know the company's name. |
|
CLA signed, thanks botty mc bot |
|
CLAs look good, thanks! |
|
Woops, it looks like it is not ready to be merged, as it makes TravisCI upset. @bborowin could you please fix the jscs style errors and update the commit message to follow our guidelines? Thnx! |
To make things less confusing, explicitly state that require WILL NOT throw a compile error if a link function is not specified. Closes #11206 stackoverflow.com/questions/28730346/require-ddo-option-of-angular-directive-does-not-throw-an-error-when-it-should
To make things less confusing, explicitly state that require WILL NOT throw a compile error if a link function is not specified. Closes angular#11206 stackoverflow.com/questions/28730346/require-ddo-option-of-angular-directive-does-not-throw-an-error-when-it-should
To make things less confusing, explicitly state that require WILL NOT throw a compile error if a link function is not specified. Closes angular#11206 stackoverflow.com/questions/28730346/require-ddo-option-of-angular-directive-does-not-throw-an-error-when-it-should
To make things less confusing, explicitly state that require WILL NOT cause a compile error if a link function is not specified.
#11198
stackoverflow.com/questions/28730346/require-ddo-option-of-angular-directive-does-not-throw-an-error-when-it-should