docs(forms): add applyWhenValue example for union validation#68853
Open
BHUVANSH855 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
docs(forms): add applyWhenValue example for union validation#68853BHUVANSH855 wants to merge 1 commit into
BHUVANSH855 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
The Signal Forms validation guide documents validation helpers such as
applyEach(), but it does not explain how to apply validation conditionally for union or variant-based forms usingapplyWhenValue().Issue Number: #66906
What is the new behavior?
Adds a new section to the Signal Forms validation guide showing how to use
applyWhenValue()with discriminated unions.The example demonstrates how different validation rules can be applied depending on the active variant.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Inspired by the discussion and examples linked in the issue and StackOverflow references.