-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 718
Draft: Docs/governance #2307
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
woutervroege
wants to merge
13
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
docs/governance
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1,095
−2
Draft
Draft: Docs/governance #2307
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2d321ff
docs: add MISSION.md
woutervroege 6bfa911
docs: add GOVERNANCE.md
woutervroege 9797448
docs: add HOW_WORK_FLOWS.md
woutervroege 2a1d23a
docs: add MEMBERS.md
woutervroege a41b516
docs: add CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
woutervroege 9dbde7d
docs: add BUGS.md
woutervroege e2d375a
docs: add RFC_PROCESS.md
woutervroege 84094b7
docs: add RFC_TEMPLATE.md
woutervroege 33aecd6
docs: add TEAM_OPERATIONS.md
woutervroege 0ef80de
docs: Add pre-code contributions section to CONTRUBUTIONS.md
woutervroege 3a488ff
docs: iterating docs and creating cross links
woutervroege c517ca0
docs: cross-linking
woutervroege 24205a7
Merge branch 'main' into docs/governance
woutervroege File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
docs: add BUGS.md
- Loading branch information
commit 9dbde7d1e796595312b3f2ab7afe4747dea2f408
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ | ||
| # Bug Reporting & Triage | ||
|
|
||
| This document explains how bugs are reported, triaged, and resolved in the project. | ||
|
|
||
| The goal is to: | ||
|
|
||
| - Make it easy for users to report issues | ||
| - Ensure bugs are handled consistently and transparently | ||
| - Keep technical decision-making with maintainers while enabling support from Product and the community | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## What Is a Bug? | ||
|
|
||
| A bug is behavior that: | ||
|
|
||
| - Is incorrect or broken compared to documented or intended behavior | ||
| - Regresses previously working functionality | ||
| - Causes crashes, data loss, or security issues | ||
|
|
||
| Requests for new features or behavior changes are **not bugs** and should be raised as ideas or proposals instead. | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Reporting a Bug | ||
|
|
||
| Anyone may report a bug. | ||
|
|
||
| Please open a **GitHub Issue** and include: | ||
|
|
||
| - A clear description of the problem | ||
| - Steps to reproduce (if possible) | ||
| - Expected vs actual behavior | ||
| - Environment details (browser, OS, version, framework, etc.) | ||
|
|
||
| If you are unsure whether something is a bug, opening an issue is still fine — maintainers will help triage it. | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Bug Triage | ||
|
|
||
| Bug triage is the process of classifying and prioritizing reported bugs. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Responsibility | ||
|
|
||
| - **Maintainers** are responsible for technical triage and classification | ||
| - **Product** may facilitate triage sessions, provide user-impact context, and help with communication | ||
| - **Contributors** may assist by reproducing issues or providing additional context | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ### Classification | ||
|
|
||
| Maintainers classify bugs based on technical severity. | ||
|
|
||
| Severity reflects **technical correctness and safety impact**, not business priority or operational uptime. | ||
|
|
||
| Severity levels: | ||
|
|
||
| - **P0 – Critical**: *Unsafe or invalid to use as-is.* Crashes, data loss, security issues, or violations of documented invariants. Users cannot safely rely on the library. | ||
| - **P1 – High**: *Safe but seriously impaired.* Core functionality is broken or severely degraded. The library can still be used with limitations or workarounds. | ||
| - **P2 – Medium**: *Correct but inconvenient.* Partial breakage or confusing behavior with reasonable workarounds available. | ||
| - **P3 – Low**: *Annoying but non-blocking.* Minor issues or cosmetic bugs that do not affect correctness or core functionality. | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Bug Lifecycle | ||
|
|
||
| Bugs typically move through the following stages. Not all bugs go through every stage, and the process may vary depending on severity and complexity. | ||
|
|
||
| 1. **Reported** | ||
|
|
||
| A bug is reported as a GitHub Issue by a user or contributor. | ||
|
|
||
| 2. **Triaged** | ||
|
|
||
| Maintainers review the issue to confirm it is a bug, request additional information if needed, and classify severity. | ||
|
|
||
| 3. **Investigated** | ||
|
|
||
| The issue is analyzed further. This may include reproducing the bug, identifying root causes, and discussing possible fixes or trade-offs. | ||
|
|
||
| 4. **Resolved** | ||
|
|
||
| A fix is implemented and reviewed via a pull request, or a decision is made not to change behavior (for example, if the behavior is working as intended). | ||
|
|
||
| 5. **Closed** | ||
|
|
||
| The issue is closed once resolved, deemed invalid, or no longer actionable. Closure should include a brief explanation whenever possible. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| High-severity bugs (P0/P1) may skip stages or be addressed immediately. | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Fixing Bugs | ||
|
|
||
| - Bugs are fixed through the normal pull request process | ||
| - Anyone may submit a fix | ||
| - Maintainers review and approve fixes | ||
|
|
||
| High-severity bugs may be addressed immediately, regardless of roadmap priorities. | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Prioritization | ||
|
|
||
| While maintainers determine technical severity, **Product** may: | ||
|
|
||
| - Help prioritize bugs relative to other work | ||
| - Balance bug fixing with feature development | ||
| - Communicate expectations to users and stakeholders | ||
|
|
||
| Bug prioritization does not override maintainer judgment on severity or correctness. | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## When a Bug Becomes an RFC | ||
|
|
||
| If fixing a bug: | ||
|
|
||
| - Requires changing core behavior | ||
| - Introduces breaking changes | ||
| - Sets new long-term precedent | ||
|
|
||
| Then the fix may require an RFC. | ||
|
|
||
| See `RFC_PROCESS.md` and **How Work Flows** for guidance. | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Stale or Invalid Bugs | ||
|
|
||
| Issues may be closed if: | ||
|
|
||
| - The issue cannot be reproduced | ||
| - Required information is missing and no response is received | ||
| - The behavior is working as intended | ||
|
|
||
| nClosure should include a brief explanation. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Guiding Principles | ||
|
|
||
| - Bugs are treated seriously and respectfully | ||
| - Technical correctness comes before speed | ||
| - Transparency is preferred over silence | ||
| - When in doubt, discuss openly | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this could also be the other way around where Product leads technical triage and classification, and maintainers can help with more technical issues and provide input about technical impact etc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(after reading on); For highly technical issues your approach makes sense (maintainers lead classification in p0-p3).
However, I think what we're missing:
etc. Point is; there's probably quite some work around managing issue lifecycle that's not deeply technical per se