Skip to content

Revert "Only run cargo check when rust code is changed"#7579

Open
ShaharNaveh wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
revert-7572-cargo-check-when-needed
Open

Revert "Only run cargo check when rust code is changed"#7579
ShaharNaveh wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
revert-7572-cargo-check-when-needed

Conversation

@ShaharNaveh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ShaharNaveh ShaharNaveh commented Apr 10, 2026 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Reverts #7572

This always skips, I'll test it a bit more. for now restore it to the way it was

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Simplified CI workflow configuration by streamlining job dependencies and condition checks.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 10, 2026 •
edited
Loading

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 11530a4b-ba6d-4a25-ad6f-ef7224b1b802

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a49ce5b and ffbb301.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yaml
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request removes the determine_changes job from the GitHub Actions CI workflow that checked for Rust file modifications. The cargo_check job is simplified to gate directly on the skip:ci PR label condition instead of depending on the removed job's output.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CI Workflow Simplification
.github/workflows/ci.yaml		 Removed determine_changes job and its associated Git-based file filtering logic. Updated cargo_check to use direct label-based gating via if condition instead of conditional dependency output checking.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A workflow streamlined, a job bid adieu,
No more merge-base diffs, no paths to eschew,
One label condition, so elegant and clean,
The simplest CI pipeline we've seen! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: reverting a previous commit that modified cargo check behavior.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch revert-7572-cargo-check-when-needed

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ShaharNaveh