Skip to content

Improved memory-related wording#6181

Merged
jborsecnik merged 1 commit into
MicrosoftDocs:livefrom
greglow-sdu:patch-67
Mar 23, 2021
Merged

Improved memory-related wording#6181
jborsecnik merged 1 commit into
MicrosoftDocs:livefrom
greglow-sdu:patch-67

Conversation

@greglow-sdu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The current wording is incorrect. It suggests that as soon as you start using sp_xml_preparedocument that you lose 1/8 of SQL Server's memory. It's easy to show that this is not true. That's a limit. In addition, a suggestion is added that the nodes() method might be a better alternative in many cases, and avoid this issue in the first place. A reference to it was also added.

The current wording is incorrect. It suggests that as soon as you start using sp_xml_preparedocument that you lose 1/8 of SQL Server's memory. This is demonstratably not true. That's a limit. In addition, a suggestion is added that the nodes() method might be a better alternative in many cases, and avoid this issue in the first place.
@PRMerger12
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@greglow-sdu : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@markingmyname markingmyname left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changes approved

@markingmyname
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

#sign-off

@jborsecnik jborsecnik merged commit 66f7a88 into MicrosoftDocs:live Mar 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants