Conversation
Yes, that should be part of the contribution mechanics section. |
|
Thanks for this fix @MaineC. For the note about "contribution negotiation": |
{{ message }}
Member
Member
Member
Author
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A long time ago we decided to call things "InnerSource" - written without space and in camel case. This pattern seems to pre-date this decision, so changing.
One note to self: There is an empty reference to "contribution negotiation" - I believe some of the teams at Europace already found out that in addition to contribution guidelines and warranty the entire contribution process starts before the submission of the code change. IIRC something like that was also part of our contributor training that I did with @lenucksi. Likely we already have the knowledge for that pattern in the community.