Skip to content

Update Gradle dependencies - #12169

Open
dd-octo-sts[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/update-gradle-dependencies-20260809
Open

Update Gradle dependencies#12169
dd-octo-sts[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/update-gradle-dependencies-20260809

Conversation

@dd-octo-sts

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What Does This Do

This PR updates the Gradle dependency locks for common and product modules.

Motivation

Refresh Gradle dependencies to make sure to apply the latest version available when bumping dependencies.

Contributor Checklist

  • Update PR title if a code change is needed to support one of those new dependencies

@dd-octo-sts @github-actions
chore: Update Gradle dependencies
1169102 
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes tag: dependencies Dependencies related changes labels Aug 9, 2026
@dd-octo-sts
dd-octo-sts Bot requested review from a team as code owners August 9, 2026 04:37
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added the tag: dependencies Dependencies related changes label Aug 9, 2026
@dd-octo-sts
dd-octo-sts Bot requested review from a team as code owners August 9, 2026 04:37
@dd-octo-sts
dd-octo-sts Bot requested review from amarziali, andreimatei, claponcet, dromanol, leoromanovsky, mhlidd and typotter and removed request for a team August 9, 2026 04:37
@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Debugger benchmarks

Parameters

Baseline Candidate
baseline_or_candidate baseline candidate
ci_job_date 1786250807 1786251153
end_time 2026-08-09T04:48:12 2026-08-09T04:53:59
git_branch master ci/update-gradle-dependencies-20260809
git_commit_sha 5e5d3af 1169102
start_time 2026-08-09T04:46:48 2026-08-09T04:52:34
See matching parameters
Baseline Candidate
ci_job_id 1935558615 1935558615
ci_pipeline_id 129823849 129823849
cpu_model Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz
git_commit_date 1786250270 1786250270

Summary

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 9 metrics, 6 unstable metrics.

See unchanged results
scenario Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_min Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_p50 Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_p75 Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_p99 Δ mean throughput
scenario:noprobe unstable
[-30.740µs; +39.285µs] or [-10.363%; +13.243%]		 unstable
[-41.297µs; +55.423µs] or [-12.201%; +16.375%]		 unstable
[-52.064µs; +66.568µs] or [-14.651%; +18.732%]		 unstable
[-153.792µs; +190.848µs] or [-12.799%; +15.883%]		 same
scenario:basic unsure
[-9.376µs; -0.372µs] or [-3.496%; -0.139%]		 same same unstable
[-194.992µs; +65.333µs] or [-18.326%; +6.140%]		 unstable
[-139.407op/s; +139.407op/s] or [-5.576%; +5.576%]
scenario:loop same same same same same
Request duration reports for reports 
gantt
    title reports - request duration [CI 0.99] : candidate=None, baseline=None
    dateFormat X
    axisFormat %s
section baseline
noprobe (338.462 µs) : 301, 376
.   : milestone, 338,
basic (297.296 µs) : 291, 304
.   : milestone, 297,
loop (8.98 ms) : 8975, 8985
.   : milestone, 8980,
section candidate
noprobe (345.526 µs) : 293, 398
.   : milestone, 346,
basic (295.315 µs) : 288, 302
.   : milestone, 295,
loop (8.995 ms) : 8972, 9017
.   : milestone, 8995,
Loading
  • baseline results
Scenario Request median duration [CI 0.99]
noprobe 338.462 µs [300.675 µs, 376.25 µs]
basic 297.296 µs [290.629 µs, 303.963 µs]
loop 8.98 ms [8.975 ms, 8.985 ms]
  • candidate results
Scenario Request median duration [CI 0.99]
noprobe 345.526 µs [292.614 µs, 398.438 µs]
basic 295.315 µs [288.278 µs, 302.352 µs]
loop 8.995 ms [8.972 ms, 9.017 ms]

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite Status
Startup 🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results
Scenario Candidate master Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent 14.02 s 13.99 s [-0.5%; +0.9%] (no difference)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent 12.96 s 12.97 s [-0.7%; +0.5%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent 17.52 s 17.37 s [-0.3%; +2.1%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent 17.44 s 17.11 s [-2.4%; +6.3%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent 17.46 s 17.49 s [-1.3%; +1.1%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent 17.04 s 17.29 s [-5.9%; +3.0%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent 16.57 s 16.58 s [-1.1%; +0.9%] (no difference)

Commit: 11691022 · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI

Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2[bot]
datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot reviewed Aug 9, 2026
View reviewed changes

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Datadog Autotest: PASS

More details

The lockfile refresh changes SpotBugs tooling and aligns the stale libsqreen lock entry with the version already declared by the AppSec module; no production source or runtime dependency declaration changed. Representative core, metrics, and remote-config compilation passed, while test and SpotBugs execution were limited by missing offline-cached artifacts.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

📊 Validated against 3 scenarios · Open Bits AI session

🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 1169102 · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest

@AlexeyKuznetsov-DD

AlexeyKuznetsov-DD commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-08-09 21:07:06 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2026-08-09 21:07:15 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 2h (p90).

2026-08-09 21:40:30 UTC ❌ MergeQueue: The build pipeline contains failing jobs for this merge request

Build pipeline has failing jobs for c26635b:

⚠️ Do NOT retry failed jobs directly (why?).

What to do next?

  • Investigate the failures and when ready, re-add your pull request to the queue!
  • If your PR checks are green, try to rebase/merge. It might be because the CI run is a bit old.
  • Any question, go check the FAQ.
Details

Since those jobs are not marked as being allowed to fail, the pipeline will most likely fail.
Therefore, and to allow other builds to be processed, this merge request has been rejected and the pipeline got canceled.

@AlexeyKuznetsov-DD

AlexeyKuznetsov-DD commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 10, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-08-10 01:25:45 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2026-08-10 01:25:50 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 2h (p90).

2026-08-10 02:02:56 UTC ❌ MergeQueue: The build pipeline contains failing jobs for this merge request

Build pipeline has failing jobs for 510e136:

⚠️ Do NOT retry failed jobs directly (why?).

What to do next?

  • Investigate the failures and when ready, re-add your pull request to the queue!
  • If your PR checks are green, try to rebase/merge. It might be because the CI run is a bit old.
  • Any question, go check the FAQ.
Details

Since those jobs are not marked as being allowed to fail, the pipeline will most likely fail.
Therefore, and to allow other builds to be processed, this merge request has been rejected and the pipeline got canceled.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2[bot] datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2[bot] left review comments
@AlexeyKuznetsov-DD AlexeyKuznetsov-DD AlexeyKuznetsov-DD approved these changes
@leoromanovsky leoromanovsky Awaiting requested review from leoromanovsky leoromanovsky is a code owner automatically assigned from DataDog/feature-flagging-and-experimentation-sdk
@typotter typotter Awaiting requested review from typotter typotter is a code owner automatically assigned from DataDog/feature-flagging-and-experimentation-sdk
@andreimatei andreimatei Awaiting requested review from andreimatei andreimatei is a code owner automatically assigned from DataDog/debugger-java
@claponcet claponcet Awaiting requested review from claponcet claponcet is a code owner automatically assigned from DataDog/asm-java
@dromanol dromanol Awaiting requested review from dromanol dromanol is a code owner automatically assigned from DataDog/asm-java
@amarziali amarziali Awaiting requested review from amarziali amarziali is a code owner automatically assigned from DataDog/apm-lang-platform-java
@mhlidd mhlidd Awaiting requested review from mhlidd mhlidd is a code owner automatically assigned from DataDog/apm-sdk-capabilities-java

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

tag: dependencies Dependencies related changes tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@AlexeyKuznetsov-DD