Skip to content

nist_800_53: fix sync script variable lookup and complete CIS→NIST mappings#14785

Open
ggbecker wants to merge 1 commit into
ComplianceAsCode:masterfrom
ggbecker:investigate-nist-sync-issue
Open

nist_800_53: fix sync script variable lookup and complete CIS→NIST mappings#14785
ggbecker wants to merge 1 commit into
ComplianceAsCode:masterfrom
ggbecker:investigate-nist-sync-issue

Conversation

@ggbecker
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ggbecker ggbecker commented Jun 8, 2026

Description:

  • nist_800_53: fix sync script variable lookup and complete CIS→NIST mappings
    • Fix two bugs in sync_nist_split.py that caused mapped variables to land in other.yml instead of their NIST family files, and add 42 missing CIS→NIST rule/variable mappings so all reference files are fully populated with no other.yml remaining.

Rationale:

…ppings

Fix two bugs in sync_nist_split.py that caused mapped variables to land
in other.yml instead of their NIST family files, and add 42 missing
CIS→NIST rule/variable mappings so all reference files are fully
populated with no other.yml remaining.
@ggbecker ggbecker added this to the 0.1.82 milestone Jun 8, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

@ggbecker: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/4.21-images 4f4c0bd link true /test 4.21-images
ci/prow/4.20-images 4f4c0bd link true /test 4.20-images
ci/prow/e2e-aws-openshift-node-compliance 4f4c0bd link true /test e2e-aws-openshift-node-compliance
ci/prow/e2e-aws-openshift-platform-compliance 4f4c0bd link true /test e2e-aws-openshift-platform-compliance

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant