Skip to content

PWGHF:Add Xicc analysis#6076

Closed
ginnocen wants to merge 23 commits into
AliceO2Group:devfrom
ginnocen:xicc
Closed

PWGHF:Add Xicc analysis#6076
ginnocen wants to merge 23 commits into
AliceO2Group:devfrom
ginnocen:xicc

Conversation

@ginnocen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@ginnocen ginnocen commented May 5, 2021

No description provided.

@ginnocen ginnocen changed the title Draft of the Xicc analysis PWGHF:Add Xicc analysis May 6, 2021
@ginnocen ginnocen changed the title PWGHF:Add Xicc analysis PWGHF:Add Xicc analysis (work in progress) May 6, 2021
@ginnocen ginnocen marked this pull request as ready for review May 6, 2021 06:10
@ginnocen ginnocen marked this pull request as draft May 6, 2021 18:44
@ginnocen ginnocen force-pushed the xicc branch 3 times, most recently from bec0368 to 2dac499 Compare May 8, 2021 17:56
@ginnocen ginnocen marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2021 15:14
@vkucera vkucera marked this pull request as draft May 18, 2021 19:47
* more signal/backgroud histograms
@ginnocen ginnocen force-pushed the xicc branch 4 times, most recently from d73b9a9 to 13b433b Compare May 23, 2021 17:38
@ginnocen ginnocen marked this pull request as ready for review May 23, 2021 19:52
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@vkucera vkucera left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

General comments:

  • Use named numbers.
  • Mention the name of the enum.
  • Avoid TaskName.
  • Follow naming conventions.

Comment thread Analysis/Tasks/PWGHF/HFCandidateCreatorXicc.cxx Outdated
Comment thread Analysis/Tasks/PWGHF/taskXicc.cxx Outdated
Comment thread Analysis/DataModel/include/AnalysisDataModel/HFSecondaryVertex.h Outdated
Comment thread Analysis/DataModel/include/AnalysisDataModel/HFSecondaryVertex.h Outdated
Comment thread Analysis/Tasks/PWGHF/HFCandidateCreatorXicc.cxx Outdated
Comment thread Analysis/Tasks/PWGHF/HFCandidateCreatorXicc.cxx Outdated
Comment thread Analysis/Tasks/PWGHF/HFCandidateCreatorXicc.cxx Outdated
Comment thread Analysis/Core/include/AnalysisCore/HFSelectorCuts.h Outdated
Comment thread Analysis/Tasks/PWGHF/HFCandidateCreatorXicc.cxx Outdated
@ginnocen ginnocen changed the title PWGHF:Add Xicc analysis (work in progress) PWGHF:Add Xicc analysis Jun 2, 2021
Comment on lines +222 to +225
indexRec = RecoDecay::getMatchedMCRec(particlesMC, arrayDaughters, pdg::Code::kXiCCPlusPlus, array{+kProton, -kKPlus, +kPiPlus, +kPiPlus}, true, &sign, 3);
if (indexRec > -1) {
flag = 1 << DecayType::XiccToXicPi;
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't depth 2 be used?
Don't you need to also check Ξcc -> Ξc?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I am testing a version.

Comment thread Analysis/Tasks/PWGHF/HFCandidateCreatorXicc.cxx Outdated
Comment on lines +248 to +249
if (RecoDecay::isMatchedMCGen(particlesMC, XicCandMC, int(pdg::Code::kXiCPlus), array{+kProton, -kKPlus, +kPiPlus}, true, &sign)) {
flag = sign * (1 << DecayType::XiccToXicPi);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sign should correspond to the one returned by the first isMatchedMCGen and the second isMatchedMCGen should be called with acceptAntiParticles = false to guarantee the same sign of the Ξc daughter.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hi @vkucera I need some clarification on this point, this is why I haven't considered it yet. thanks.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @vkucera, I understood the point (finally 👍 ). I will fix it accordingly

Comment thread Analysis/Tasks/PWGHF/HFXiccToPKPiPiCandidateSelector.cxx
Comment thread Analysis/Tasks/PWGHF/taskXicc.cxx Outdated
Comment thread Analysis/Tasks/PWGHF/HFCandidateCreatorXicc.cxx
Comment thread Analysis/Tasks/PWGHF/HFCandidateCreatorXicc.cxx
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Jul 9, 2021

This PR did not have any update in the last 30 days. Is it still needed? Unless further action in will be closed in 5 days.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the stale label Jul 9, 2021
@github-actions github-actions Bot closed this Jul 15, 2021
@vkucera
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

vkucera commented Aug 16, 2021

Replace by #6843

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants