PWGHF:Add Xicc analysis#6076
Conversation
bec0368 to
2dac499
Compare
* more signal/backgroud histograms
d73b9a9 to
13b433b
Compare
vkucera
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
General comments:
- Use named numbers.
- Mention the name of the
enum. - Avoid
TaskName. - Follow naming conventions.
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#6076
| indexRec = RecoDecay::getMatchedMCRec(particlesMC, arrayDaughters, pdg::Code::kXiCCPlusPlus, array{+kProton, -kKPlus, +kPiPlus, +kPiPlus}, true, &sign, 3); | ||
| if (indexRec > -1) { | ||
| flag = 1 << DecayType::XiccToXicPi; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't depth 2 be used?
Don't you need to also check Ξcc -> Ξc?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, I am testing a version.
| if (RecoDecay::isMatchedMCGen(particlesMC, XicCandMC, int(pdg::Code::kXiCPlus), array{+kProton, -kKPlus, +kPiPlus}, true, &sign)) { | ||
| flag = sign * (1 << DecayType::XiccToXicPi); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sign should correspond to the one returned by the first isMatchedMCGen and the second isMatchedMCGen should be called with acceptAntiParticles = false to guarantee the same sign of the Ξc daughter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hi @vkucera I need some clarification on this point, this is why I haven't considered it yet. thanks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @vkucera, I understood the point (finally 👍 ). I will fix it accordingly
PWGHF: Update Xi_c task
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#6076
|
This PR did not have any update in the last 30 days. Is it still needed? Unless further action in will be closed in 5 days. |
|
Replace by #6843 |
No description provided.