DPL: support multiplexing of dangling outputs#4426
Conversation
|
@ironMann @matthiasrichter I am changing the behaviour to have single channel for all the outputs. If needed, the old behaviour can be provided again by improving the |
25bb042 to
230d692
Compare
|
Thanks. |
|
Not a channel (yet) but a separate device. Yes, the o2-dpl-output-proxy should be effectively unneeded. Basically once this PR (and the associated one for the input proxy) will be merged, all you will need is the data processing workflow itself. |
|
I mean: a separate device with a "downstream" channel. |
|
Already tested on macOS. @MichaelLettrich are the macs working fine? |
|
@kft, Still I cannot specify endpoints for input and output channels. See bellow. It seems that the channel specified second is always reported as an error. |
|
I will check. Can you verify that with the default path it works? I think you can force the folder with $TMPDIR. |
|
The actual syntax is: I.e. you need to specify via |
No description provided.