In this code:
from typing import TypeVar, Generic
T = TypeVar('T')
class Foo(Generic[T]):
@staticmethod
def create(arg: T) -> 'Foo[T]':
...
reveal_type(Foo.create(1234))
What should the type be? Should T be inferred based on the argument to the static method, resulting in Foo[int]? Or should it be Foo[Unknown] or similar?
mypy (python/mypy@fe15ee69b) picks Foo[int].
pyright used to choose Foo[int], but microsoft/pyright#7454 changed it to pick Foo[Unknown], on the grounds that this is required to comply with PEP 696's statement:
Type parameter defaults should be bound by attribute access (including call and subscript).
My example does not include any type parameter defaults, but I can see the logic of applying the same rule without one: you wouldn't want it to be a breaking change to add a default.
Still, why can't these kinds of static method calls be treated like constructor calls, where class type parameters can be inferred from arguments?
In this code:
What should the type be? Should
Tbe inferred based on the argument to the static method, resulting inFoo[int]? Or should it beFoo[Unknown]or similar?mypy (python/mypy@fe15ee69b) picks
Foo[int].pyright used to choose
Foo[int], but microsoft/pyright#7454 changed it to pickFoo[Unknown], on the grounds that this is required to comply with PEP 696's statement:My example does not include any type parameter defaults, but I can see the logic of applying the same rule without one: you wouldn't want it to be a breaking change to add a default.
Still, why can't these kinds of static method calls be treated like constructor calls, where class type parameters can be inferred from arguments?