Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add _sqlite3 module #11174

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

add _sqlite3 module #11174

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

tungol
Copy link
Contributor

@tungol tungol commented Dec 16, 2023

This aligns with the implementation while giving greater fidelity to runtime naming and inheritance

Related to #3968 and #11141

This aligns with the implementation while giving greater fidelity
to runtime naming and inheritance

Related to python#3968 and python#11141
@tungol tungol marked this pull request as draft December 16, 2023 21:48

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

According to mypy_primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉

@tungol tungol marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2023 22:20
@tungol tungol marked this pull request as draft December 16, 2023 23:27
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ _pydecimal: 3.5-
_random: 2.7-
_sitebuiltins: 3.4-
_socket: 3.0- # present in 2.7 at runtime, but not in typeshed
_sqlite3: 2.7-
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
_sqlite3: 2.7-
_sqlite3: 3.0-

We just merged a PR removing all the 2.7 lines.

Also, general note: I was away for a few weeks and I see you have a number of open PRs that haven't been merged yet. I'm just glancing through my notifications at the moment, but when I find some time I'll try to go over open nondraft typeshed PRs to review what I can.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Appreciated, but no rush

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants