Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-30225: Fix is_valid_fd() on macOS Tiger #1443

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 3, 2017

Conversation

vstinner
Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner commented May 3, 2017

is_valid_fd() now uses fstat() instead of dup() on macOS to return 0
on a pipe when the other side of the pipe is closed. fstat() fails
with EBADF in that case, whereas dup() succeed.

is_valid_fd() now uses fstat() instead of dup() on macOS to return 0
on a pipe when the other side of the pipe is closed. fstat() fails
with EBADF in that case, whereas dup() succeed.
@mention-bot
Copy link

mention-bot commented May 3, 2017

@Haypo, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @ncoghlan, @vadmium and @zooba to be potential reviewers.

@vstinner
Copy link
Member Author

vstinner commented May 3, 2017

I tested manually that this change fixes http://bugs.python.org/issue30225 on macOS Tiger. (I got a SSH access to the buildbot slave.)

@vstinner vstinner merged commit 1c4670e into python:master May 3, 2017
@vstinner vstinner deleted the is_valid_fd_tiger branch May 3, 2017
vstinner added a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2017
is_valid_fd() now uses fstat() instead of dup() on macOS to return 0
on a pipe when the other side of the pipe is closed. fstat() fails
with EBADF in that case, whereas dup() succeed.
(cherry picked from commit 1c4670e)
vstinner added a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2017
is_valid_fd() now uses fstat() instead of dup() on macOS to return 0
on a pipe when the other side of the pipe is closed. fstat() fails
with EBADF in that case, whereas dup() succeed.
(cherry picked from commit 1c4670e)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants