Skip to content

Update 3.0_migration.mdx#4326

Merged
rrousselGit merged 2 commits intorrousselGit:masterfrom
B-Saeid:3.0_migration_doc_update
Sep 25, 2025
Merged

Update 3.0_migration.mdx#4326
rrousselGit merged 2 commits intorrousselGit:masterfrom
B-Saeid:3.0_migration_doc_update

Conversation

@B-Saeid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@B-Saeid B-Saeid commented Sep 25, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai Bot
Loading

Minor update to avoid misunderstanding in 3.0 migration guide.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated 3.0 migration guide to show that per-container retry customization is effectively disabled in the showcased pattern.
    • Clarified TickerMode behavior: descendant listeners are not paused while TickerMode is active and guidance on when automatic pausing resumes.
    • Restored and adjusted the ProviderException reference link for improved navigation.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

Documentation updates in website/docs/3.0_migration.mdx simplify a retry callback to a single-expression form that always returns null, change a TickerMode example from enabled: false to enabled: true with updated comments about pausing behavior, and adjust a ProviderException reference link. No code or API changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
Migration guide adjustments
website/docs/3.0_migration.mdx		 - Retry callback example simplified to always return null (single-expression)
- TickerMode example set to enabled: true with revised commentary on descendant pausing/automatic pausing behavior
- ProviderException reference link/anchor line adjusted (rendered reference line changed)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • Add 3.0 blogs #4094 — Edits the same migration guide file with closely matching example and link updates.

Poem

A rabbit hops through docs so bright,
Ticks now hum in TickerMode’s light.
Retries return null — a tidy trick,
Links stitched back, the guide looks slick.
Thump-thump — I nibble, then I skip.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The current title merely names the file being updated without conveying the nature of the documentation changes made in the migration guide, making it too generic for readers to understand the core update at a glance. Please revise the title to clearly summarize the key documentation changes, for example “Clarify ProviderContainer retry customization and TickerMode behavior in 3.0 migration guide,” so that reviewers immediately understand the update’s purpose.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 151135c and fcf5bed.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • website/docs/3.0_migration.mdx (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)
  • GitHub Check: riverpod_lint (stable, packages/riverpod_analyzer_utils)
  • GitHub Check: riverpod_lint (stable, packages/riverpod_analyzer_utils_tests)
  • GitHub Check: riverpod_lint (master, packages/riverpod_analyzer_utils_tests)
  • GitHub Check: riverpod_lint (stable, packages/riverpod_lint_flutter_test)
  • GitHub Check: riverpod_lint (master, packages/riverpod_lint_flutter_test)
  • GitHub Check: check_generation
🔇 Additional comments (1)
website/docs/3.0_migration.mdx (1)

96-104: Clarified TickerMode guidance looks good

The updated enabled: true example and accompanying comments correctly communicate how to opt out of the automatic pausing behavior. Thanks for tightening up the wording.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai Bot reviewed Sep 25, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce5aabe and 151135c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • website/docs/3.0_migration.mdx (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)
  • GitHub Check: check_generation
  • GitHub Check: riverpod_lint (stable, packages/riverpod_analyzer_utils_tests)
  • GitHub Check: riverpod_lint (master, packages/riverpod_lint_flutter_test)
  • GitHub Check: riverpod_lint (stable, packages/riverpod_lint_flutter_test)
  • GitHub Check: riverpod_lint (master, packages/riverpod_analyzer_utils_tests)

Comment thread website/docs/3.0_migration.mdx Outdated
@B-Saeid @coderabbitai
Fix a typo
fcf5bed 
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@rrousselGit rrousselGit merged commit 4b808fc into rrousselGit:master Sep 25, 2025
13 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@B-Saeid @rrousselGit