Skip to content

Recognize JDK 26#335

Merged
slawekjaranowski merged 1 commit intomojohaus:masterfrom
wendigo:serafin/jdk-26
Oct 2, 2025
Merged

Recognize JDK 26#335
slawekjaranowski merged 1 commit intomojohaus:masterfrom
wendigo:serafin/jdk-26

Conversation

@wendigo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wendigo wendigo commented Oct 2, 2025

This time of the year has come ;-)

@wendigo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

wendigo commented Oct 2, 2025

I'm also asking for the release anytime soon so we can start testing with JDK 26 :) Thanks!

@wendigo wendigo mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2025
3 tasks
Comment on lines +141 to +143

// Java 26
JDK_TO_MAJOR_VERSION_NUMBER_MAPPING.put("26", 70);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is look like constant different .... maybe can be computed instead added ...

To think later as next improvements

@slawekjaranowski slawekjaranowski merged commit d54fec8 into mojohaus:master Oct 2, 2025
20 checks passed
@wendigo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

wendigo commented Oct 2, 2025

For the last 20ish releases it was FeatureVersion+44 so maybe we could lean on that @slawekjaranowski ?

@wendigo wendigo deleted the serafin/jdk-26 branch October 2, 2025 20:17
@slawekjaranowski
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

For the last 20ish releases it was FeatureVersion+44 so maybe we could lean on that @slawekjaranowski ?

We can try ... to check how and for what is used JDK_TO_MAJOR_VERSION_NUMBER_MAPPING

dongjoon-hyun added a commit to apache/spark that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to upgrade `extra-enforcer-rules` to 1.11.0.

### Why are the changes needed?

To use the latest feature and bug fixes
- https://github.com/mojohaus/extra-enforcer-rules/releases/tag/1.11.0
  - mojohaus/extra-enforcer-rules#334
  - mojohaus/extra-enforcer-rules#335

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, this is a build plugin.

### How was this patch tested?

Manual review.

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

Closes #52859 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-54161.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
huangxiaopingRD pushed a commit to huangxiaopingRD/spark that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to upgrade `extra-enforcer-rules` to 1.11.0.

### Why are the changes needed?

To use the latest feature and bug fixes
- https://github.com/mojohaus/extra-enforcer-rules/releases/tag/1.11.0
  - mojohaus/extra-enforcer-rules#334
  - mojohaus/extra-enforcer-rules#335

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, this is a build plugin.

### How was this patch tested?

Manual review.

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

Closes apache#52859 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-54161.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants