fix(jest-snapshot): Fix a potential bug when using babel and improve performance#14036
Merged
SimenB merged 3 commits intojestjs:mainfrom Mar 31, 2023
Merged
fix(jest-snapshot): Fix a potential bug when using babel and improve performance#14036SimenB merged 3 commits intojestjs:mainfrom
SimenB merged 3 commits intojestjs:mainfrom
Conversation
liuxingbaoyu
commented
Mar 29, 2023
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // A hack to prevent unexpected line breaks in the generated code | ||
| node.loc!.end.line = node.loc!.start.line; |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually only this line is the fix, the rest are refactorings.😃
|
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Member
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
While I was fixing a babel issue, I discovered that jest was expecting buggy behavior.
retainLineswill try to keep the original code and the new code on the same line.When we replace
123\n456with the single-line content123456.The previous babel would ignore the position of
)and generate this.And new babel will generate
jest was relying on the previous behavior, the PR fixes this.
Ref: babel/babel#15515
In addition, I also found that
@babel/traverseis being used in the current code to traverse the AST generated by other than@babel/parser, which is a bit unexpected.But since it's been that long, it seems like it's good enough for this simple usage.
I just replaced it with
traversefrom@babel/types, which has very simple functionality and is much faster.(Maybe 10x)Test plan
CI green