Skip to content

feat: add support for disclaiming utility processes#49695

Merged
codebytere merged 1 commit into40-x-yfrom
manual-backport-disclaim-feat
Feb 11, 2026
Merged

feat: add support for disclaiming utility processes#49695
codebytere merged 1 commit into40-x-yfrom
manual-backport-disclaim-feat

Conversation

@VerteDinde
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Manual backport of #49128

See that PR for details.

Notes: Added a disclaim option to the UtilityProcess API to allow for TCC disclaiming on macOS.

* feat: add support for disclaiming utility processes

* chore: update patches

---------

Co-authored-by: Keeley Hammond <vertedinde@electronjs.org>
@VerteDinde VerteDinde requested a review from a team as a code owner February 5, 2026 23:03
@electron-cation electron-cation Bot added the new-pr 🌱 PR opened recently label Feb 5, 2026
@trop trop Bot requested a review from a team February 5, 2026 23:03
@trop trop Bot added 40-x-y backport This is a backport PR backport/requested 🗳 semver/minor backwards-compatible functionality labels Feb 5, 2026
@electron-cation electron-cation Bot removed the new-pr 🌱 PR opened recently label Feb 5, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@codebytere codebytere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved by @electron/wg-releases on Feb 10 2025

@codebytere codebytere merged commit fdd31a7 into 40-x-y Feb 11, 2026
121 of 129 checks passed
@codebytere codebytere deleted the manual-backport-disclaim-feat branch February 11, 2026 15:51
@release-clerk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

release-clerk Bot commented Feb 11, 2026

Release Notes Persisted

Added a disclaim option to the UtilityProcess API to allow for TCC disclaiming on macOS.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

40-x-y backport/approved ✅ backport This is a backport PR semver/minor backwards-compatible functionality

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants