Skip to content

chore: bump fast-xml-parser to 5.5.6#7862

Merged
smilkuri merged 1 commit intomainfrom
bump/fast-xml-parser
Mar 18, 2026
Merged

chore: bump fast-xml-parser to 5.5.6#7862
smilkuri merged 1 commit intomainfrom
bump/fast-xml-parser

Conversation

@smilkuri
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@smilkuri smilkuri commented Mar 18, 2026

Issue

#7853

Description

Bumps fast-xml-parser from 5.4.1 to 5.5.6

Testing

CI

Checklist

  • If the PR is a feature, add integration tests (*.integ.spec.ts) or E2E tests.
    • It's not a feature.
  • My E2E tests are resilient to concurrent i/o.
    • I didn't write any E2E tests.
  • I added access level annotations e.g. @public, @internal tags and enabled doc generation on the package. Remember that access level annotations go below the description, not above.
    • I didn't add any public functions.
  • Streams - how do they work?? My WebStream readers/locks are properly lifecycled. Node.js stream backpressure is handled. Error handling.
    • No streams here.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@smilkuri smilkuri requested a review from a team as a code owner March 18, 2026 14:24
@smilkuri smilkuri force-pushed the bump/fast-xml-parser branch from b84a35e to 2dc7149 Compare March 18, 2026 14:27
@smilkuri smilkuri merged commit 5e8d73b into main Mar 18, 2026
7 checks passed
@smilkuri smilkuri deleted the bump/fast-xml-parser branch March 18, 2026 15:41
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Apr 2, 2026

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread.

@github-actions github-actions Bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 2, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants