Skip to content

[SUREFIRE-2177] Use junit-bom instead of single JUnit 5 versions#663

Merged
slawekjaranowski merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
scordio:junit-bom
Jul 14, 2023
Merged

[SUREFIRE-2177] Use junit-bom instead of single JUnit 5 versions#663
slawekjaranowski merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
scordio:junit-bom

Conversation

@scordio
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@scordio scordio commented Jun 9, 2023

@scordio scordio marked this pull request as ready for review June 9, 2023 07:45
@scordio scordio changed the title [SUREFIRE-2177] Favor junit-bom instead of single JUnit 5 versions [SUREFIRE-2177] Use junit-bom instead of single JUnit 5 versions Jun 9, 2023
@scordio
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

scordio commented Jun 9, 2023

As far as I can judge, the two failing jobs don't seem to be related to my changes, but let me know in case I should look into something.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@michael-o michael-o left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice improvement

@olamy olamy added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 10, 2023
@slawekjaranowski slawekjaranowski merged commit 27548ec into apache:master Jul 14, 2023
@scordio scordio deleted the junit-bom branch July 14, 2023 18:52
@jira-importer
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Resolve #2675

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants