Conversation
4f9e140 to
e05a557
Compare
From 3.14 onwards, we'll get `foo | bar` instead of `typing.Union[foo, bar]` as the annotation for union types (including optional). This PR prepares the codegen script for this.
Merged
jorenham
pushed a commit
to jorenham/LibCST
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
From 3.14 onwards, we'll get `foo | bar` instead of `typing.Union[foo, bar]` as the annotation for union types (including optional). This PR prepares the codegen script for this.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
codegen: Support pipe syntax for Union types
From 3.14 onwards, we'll get
foo | barinstead oftyping.Union[foo, bar]as the annotation for union types (including optional). This PR prepares the codegen script for this.