Rework annotations to use JSON instead of UDTs #1367
Unanswered
jgebal
asked this question in
Feature Requests
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Problem or motivation
Annotations are currently defined, searched, and filtered via PL/SQL object types.
Proposed solution
This discussion is proposing a move to JSON so annotation data is easier to extend, query, and pass around without depending on database-defined types.
There needs to be a proof of concept created first to check if move to JSON will actually simplify some of the existing code and if the performance of suite-building will not be negatively impacted by that change.
The JSON annotation schema should definitely be documented as part of the work.
The JSON schema could then be published/versioned for external tooling to rely on. The value of having the schema published needs to be assessed before time is pent on it.
Framework area
Annotations
All reactions