Add meaningful multivariate subsequence search tutorial#1138
Open
omkar-334 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
|
Found 1 changed notebook. Review the changes at https://app.gitnotebooks.com/stumpy-dev/stumpy/pull/1138 |
Contributor
|
@omkar-334 Thank you for your PR. Please allow me some time to review and provide comments |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a new tutorial inspired by Eamonn Keogh's multivariate top-k subsequence search example. The tutorial uses a self-contained synthetic sensor dataset to show why raw multivariate distances can be misleading, then demonstrates z-normalized stumpy.match and query-time channel selection for meaningful top-k matches.
Validation:
Fixes #1137