|
| 1 | +### Requirements for Adding, Changing, or Removing a Feature |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +* Fill out the template below. Any pull request that does not include enough information to be reviewed in a timely manner may be closed at the maintainers' discretion. |
| 4 | +* The pull request must contribute a change that has been endorsed by the maintainer team. See details in the template below. |
| 5 | +* The pull request must update the test suite to exercise the updated functionality. |
| 6 | +* After you create the pull request, all status checks must be pass before a maintainer reviews your contribution. For more details, please see https://github.com/etr/libhttpserver/tree/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-requests. |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +### Issue or RFC Endorsed by Maintainers |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +<!-- |
| 11 | +
|
| 12 | +If any, link to the issue your change relates to: |
| 13 | +
|
| 14 | +--> |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +### Description of the Change |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +<!-- |
| 19 | +
|
| 20 | +We must be able to understand the design of your change from this description. If we can't get a good idea of what the code will be doing from the description here, the pull request may be closed at the maintainers' discretion. Keep in mind that the maintainer reviewing this PR may not be familiar with or have worked with the code here recently, so please walk us through the concepts. |
| 21 | +
|
| 22 | +--> |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +### Alternate Designs |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +<!-- Explain what other alternates were considered and why the proposed version was selected --> |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +### Possible Drawbacks |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +<!-- What are the possible side-effects or negative impacts of the code change? --> |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +### Verification Process |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +<!-- |
| 35 | +
|
| 36 | +What process did you follow to verify that your change has the desired effects? |
| 37 | +
|
| 38 | +- How did you verify that all new functionality works as expected? |
| 39 | +- How did you verify that all changed functionality works as expected? |
| 40 | +- How did you verify that the change has not introduced any regressions? |
| 41 | +
|
| 42 | +Describe the actions you performed. |
| 43 | +
|
| 44 | +--> |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +### Release Notes |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +<!-- |
| 49 | +
|
| 50 | +Please describe the changes in a single line that explains this improvement in |
| 51 | +terms that a user can understand. This text will be used in libhttpserver's release notes. |
| 52 | +
|
| 53 | +If this change is not user-facing or notable enough to be included in release notes |
| 54 | +you may use the strings "Not applicable" or "N/A" here. |
| 55 | +
|
| 56 | +Examples: |
| 57 | +
|
| 58 | +- The GitHub package now allows you to add co-authors to commits. |
| 59 | +- Fixed an issue where multiple cursors did not work in a file with a single line. |
| 60 | +- Increased the performance of searching and replacing across a whole project. |
| 61 | +
|
| 62 | +--> |
0 commit comments