Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
With the release of dotnet 9 and C# 13 right around the corner, I was wondering if anyone had considered adding support for the new partial properties syntax.
I have VERY limited (read: almost none) experience with Source Generators, so I'll apologize right away if this is a dumb idea!
Describe the solution you'd like
Using partial properties, it SHOULD be possible to allow us to define [Reactive] properties using the property itself instead of a field. Ex:
public partial class C
{
[Reactive]
public partial string Name { get; set; }
}
Describe alternatives you've considered
The current way of doing things works (of course), it's just less explicit since you just need to expect the Property to be generated properly.
Describe suggestions on how to achieve the feature
Additional context
Some (hopefully) useful links:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
With the release of dotnet 9 and C# 13 right around the corner, I was wondering if anyone had considered adding support for the new
partialproperties syntax.I have VERY limited (read: almost none) experience with Source Generators, so I'll apologize right away if this is a dumb idea!
Describe the solution you'd like
Using partial properties, it SHOULD be possible to allow us to define
[Reactive]properties using the property itself instead of a field. Ex:Describe alternatives you've considered
The current way of doing things works (of course), it's just less explicit since you just need to expect the Property to be generated properly.
Describe suggestions on how to achieve the feature
Additional context
Some (hopefully) useful links: