Skip to content

What is the policy/attitude towards LLM contributions in Racket? #5466

@zyd-n

Description

@zyd-n

Hi, I'm looking over a bunch of Scheme implementations as well as Scheme-descended/adjacent projects (hence, Racket) to see how projects contributors and maintainers are responding to the proliferation of LLMs. I don't see anything that resembles an official 'policy' or guideline to LLM generated/assisted/enhanced/based/ contributions in Racket.

There seems to be some LLM generated/assisted code already in Racket itself:

Can I take it that LLM contributions are welcomed in Racket by the maintainers and contributors?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions