feat: use server_key when processing DNSService records#1238
Merged
Conversation
This is a small cleanup to avoid calling .lower() when we already have the server_key. performance benefit is negligible
This is a small cleanup to avoid calling .lower() when we already have the server_key. performance benefit is negligible
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1238 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 99.82% 99.78% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 25 25
Lines 2805 2805
Branches 479 479
==========================================
- Hits 2800 2799 -1
Misses 3 3
- Partials 2 3 +1
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a small cleanup to avoid calling .lower() when we already have the server_key. performance benefit is negligible