From 811464507721514e5e682251d8e1d99a66a5b96f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cheryl Sabella Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 16:37:51 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] bpo-32735: Fix typo in f-strings datetime format specifier example (GH-5464) The f-string example for using datetime format specifier does not match the given output. Changed the format from %b to %B so it matches the output of "January". (cherry picked from commit b299393cc372f3ecbef4304f8eaa4c7838e975ca) Co-authored-by: Cheryl Sabella --- Doc/reference/lexical_analysis.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Doc/reference/lexical_analysis.rst b/Doc/reference/lexical_analysis.rst index 7ad83947e04aae..6d093dcc2a2219 100644 --- a/Doc/reference/lexical_analysis.rst +++ b/Doc/reference/lexical_analysis.rst @@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ Some examples of formatted string literals:: >>> f"result: {value:{width}.{precision}}" # nested fields 'result: 12.35' >>> today = datetime(year=2017, month=1, day=27) - >>> f"{today:%b %d, %Y}" # using date format specifier + >>> f"{today:%B %d, %Y}" # using date format specifier 'January 27, 2017' >>> number = 1024 >>> f"{number:#0x}" # using integer format specifier