From 39cebb21464b4541c2da73c94b1cb3bf16230c97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Peterson Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 23:00:02 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] remove support for splitting the ceval switch into multiple switches This kludge is from 1992. Any C99 compiler is going to be able to handle the ceval dispatch switch. Anyway, we have much bigger switches than the ceval dispatch one around. (See, e.g., Objects/unicodetype_db.h.) --- Python/ceval.c | 10 ---------- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/Python/ceval.c b/Python/ceval.c index f9a798c8565692d..58a2513b3ef9695 100644 --- a/Python/ceval.c +++ b/Python/ceval.c @@ -22,9 +22,6 @@ #include -/* Turn this on if your compiler chokes on the big switch: */ -/* #define CASE_TOO_BIG 1 */ - #ifdef Py_DEBUG /* For debugging the interpreter: */ #define LLTRACE 1 /* Low-level trace feature */ @@ -1662,9 +1659,6 @@ _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault(PyFrameObject *f, int throwflag) DISPATCH(); } -#ifdef CASE_TOO_BIG - default: switch (opcode) { -#endif TARGET(RAISE_VARARGS) { PyObject *cause = NULL, *exc = NULL; switch (oparg) { @@ -3373,10 +3367,6 @@ _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault(PyFrameObject *f, int throwflag) PyErr_SetString(PyExc_SystemError, "unknown opcode"); goto error; -#ifdef CASE_TOO_BIG - } -#endif - } /* switch */ /* This should never be reached. Every opcode should end with DISPATCH()