From 87fb2473072e2631af3c714654fe986bcf06dd2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robsdedude <dev@rouvenbauer.de>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2026 22:56:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix format string syntax grammar

When it comes to names for fields or attributes, format strings are much more
permissive than the documentation implies.
---
 Doc/library/string.rst | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Doc/library/string.rst b/Doc/library/string.rst
index be968a3c53d8430..d4c17d12928c94d 100644
--- a/Doc/library/string.rst
+++ b/Doc/library/string.rst
@@ -219,8 +219,9 @@ The grammar for a replacement field is as follows:
 .. productionlist:: format-string
    replacement_field: "{" [`field_name`] ["!" `conversion`] [":" `format_spec`] "}"
    field_name: `arg_name` ("." `attribute_name` | "[" `element_index` "]")*
-   arg_name: [`~python-grammar:identifier` | `~python-grammar:digit`+]
-   attribute_name: `~python-grammar:identifier`
+   arg_name: [`name_string` | `~python-grammar:digit`+]
+   attribute_name: `name_string`
+   name_string: <any source character except "!", ".", ":", "[", "{", "}"> +
    element_index: `~python-grammar:digit`+ | `index_string`
    index_string: <any source character except "]"> +
    conversion: "r" | "s" | "a"