Bug: LZMA decompression accepts an attacker-controlled dictionary size with no bound, and liblzma allocates the full dictionary up front when a decompressor is created. A few bytes of input can therefore force a multi-gigabyte allocation (memory denial of service).
Attack surfaces (both reported by OSS-Fuzz, both public):
zipfile with an LZMA-compressed member: the 5-byte LZMA properties header in the member data declares the dictionary. A 1088-byte zip whose member declares a ~2 GiB dictionary OOMs the process. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/495472861
tarfile's compression-detection loop: a 13-byte input whose first byte is a valid LZMA-alone properties byte (0x66) and whose remaining bytes encode a ~4 GiB dictionary is tried as LZMA; liblzma allocates 4 GiB before failing. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/482161128
Also reachable directly: lzma.decompress() / LZMADecompressor(format=FORMAT_AUTO) on untrusted bytes, and LZMADecompressor(FORMAT_RAW, filters=[{"dict_size": ...}]).
Root cause: two gaps:
parse_filter_spec_lzma() accepts any dict_size (up to UINT32_MAX) for raw LZMA1/LZMA2 filter chains; liblzma allocates that dictionary at decompressor creation.
LZMADecompressor defaults memlimit to UINT64_MAX, so the FORMAT_ALONE/FORMAT_AUTO paths (where the header is parsed inside liblzma) are also unbounded.
Proposed fix (PR to follow):
- Reject
dict_size > LZMA_DICT_SIZE_MAX (1.5 GiB, liblzma's own maximum) in parse_filter_spec_lzma() with LZMAError.
- Default the decompressor
memlimit to LZMA_DICT_SIZE_MAX instead of UINT64_MAX (callers may still pass an explicit memlimit).
No legitimate streams are affected: liblzma presets cap at 64 MiB dictionaries, and 1.5 GiB is liblzma's own maximum supported dictionary size.
Reported by OSS-Fuzz (ClusterFuzz). Reproducers attached to the issues above.
Linked PRs
Bug: LZMA decompression accepts an attacker-controlled dictionary size with no bound, and liblzma allocates the full dictionary up front when a decompressor is created. A few bytes of input can therefore force a multi-gigabyte allocation (memory denial of service).
Attack surfaces (both reported by OSS-Fuzz, both public):
zipfilewith an LZMA-compressed member: the 5-byte LZMA properties header in the member data declares the dictionary. A 1088-byte zip whose member declares a ~2 GiB dictionary OOMs the process. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/495472861tarfile's compression-detection loop: a 13-byte input whose first byte is a valid LZMA-alone properties byte (0x66) and whose remaining bytes encode a ~4 GiB dictionary is tried as LZMA; liblzma allocates 4 GiB before failing. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/482161128Also reachable directly:
lzma.decompress()/LZMADecompressor(format=FORMAT_AUTO)on untrusted bytes, andLZMADecompressor(FORMAT_RAW, filters=[{"dict_size": ...}]).Root cause: two gaps:
parse_filter_spec_lzma()accepts anydict_size(up to UINT32_MAX) for raw LZMA1/LZMA2 filter chains; liblzma allocates that dictionary at decompressor creation.LZMADecompressordefaultsmemlimittoUINT64_MAX, so the FORMAT_ALONE/FORMAT_AUTO paths (where the header is parsed inside liblzma) are also unbounded.Proposed fix (PR to follow):
dict_size > LZMA_DICT_SIZE_MAX(1.5 GiB, liblzma's own maximum) inparse_filter_spec_lzma()withLZMAError.memlimittoLZMA_DICT_SIZE_MAXinstead ofUINT64_MAX(callers may still pass an explicitmemlimit).No legitimate streams are affected: liblzma presets cap at 64 MiB dictionaries, and 1.5 GiB is liblzma's own maximum supported dictionary size.
Reported by OSS-Fuzz (ClusterFuzz). Reproducers attached to the issues above.
Linked PRs