Feature or enhancement
I request that we make pathname2url and url2pathname easier to use:
pathname2url() is made to accept an optional include_scheme argument that sticks file: on the front when true
url2pathname() is made to strip any file: prefix from its argument.
I think this would go a long way towards making these functions usable, and allow us to remove the scary "This does not accept/produce a complete URL" warnings from the docs.
Linked PRs
Feature or enhancement
I request that we make
pathname2urlandurl2pathnameeasier to use:pathname2url()is made to accept an optional include_scheme argument that sticksfile:on the front when trueurl2pathname()is made to strip anyfile:prefix from its argument.I think this would go a long way towards making these functions usable, and allow us to remove the scary "This does not accept/produce a complete URL" warnings from the docs.
Linked PRs
pathname2url()andurl2pathname()#125993pathname2url()andurl2pathname()(GH-125993) #126144pathname2url()andurl2pathname()(GH-125993) #126145nturl2pathmodule #131432