Skip to content

Commit 44759bc

Browse files
Issue #28376: The constructor of range_iterator now checks that step is not 0.
Patch by Oren Milman.
1 parent 3bd9fde commit 44759bc

3 files changed

Lines changed: 43 additions & 3 deletions

File tree

Lib/test/test_range.py

Lines changed: 29 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -493,6 +493,35 @@ def test_range_iterators(self):
493493
test_id = "reversed(range({}, {}, {}))".format(start, end, step)
494494
self.assert_iterators_equal(iter1, iter2, test_id, limit=100)
495495

496+
@test.support.cpython_only
497+
def test_range_iterator_invocation(self):
498+
import _testcapi
499+
rangeiter_type = type(iter(range(0)))
500+
501+
# rangeiter_new doesn't take keyword arguments
502+
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
503+
rangeiter_type(a=1)
504+
505+
# rangeiter_new takes exactly 3 arguments
506+
self.assertRaises(TypeError, rangeiter_type)
507+
self.assertRaises(TypeError, rangeiter_type, 1)
508+
self.assertRaises(TypeError, rangeiter_type, 1, 1)
509+
self.assertRaises(TypeError, rangeiter_type, 1, 1, 1, 1)
510+
511+
# start, stop and stop must fit in C long
512+
for good_val in [_testcapi.LONG_MAX, _testcapi.LONG_MIN]:
513+
rangeiter_type(good_val, good_val, good_val)
514+
for bad_val in [_testcapi.LONG_MAX + 1, _testcapi.LONG_MIN - 1]:
515+
self.assertRaises(OverflowError,
516+
rangeiter_type, bad_val, 1, 1)
517+
self.assertRaises(OverflowError,
518+
rangeiter_type, 1, bad_val, 1)
519+
self.assertRaises(OverflowError,
520+
rangeiter_type, 1, 1, bad_val)
521+
522+
# step mustn't be zero
523+
self.assertRaises(ValueError, rangeiter_type, 1, 1, 0)
524+
496525
def test_slice(self):
497526
def check(start, stop, step=None):
498527
i = slice(start, stop, step)

Misc/NEWS

Lines changed: 3 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ Release date: TBA
1010
Core and Builtins
1111
-----------------
1212

13+
- Issue #28376: The constructor of range_iterator now checks that step is not 0.
14+
Patch by Oren Milman.
15+
1316
- Issue #26906: Resolving special methods of uninitialized type now causes
1417
implicit initialization of the type instead of a fail.
1518

Objects/rangeobject.c

Lines changed: 11 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -937,12 +937,20 @@ rangeiter_new(PyTypeObject *type, PyObject *args, PyObject *kw)
937937
{
938938
long start, stop, step;
939939

940-
if (!_PyArg_NoKeywords("rangeiter()", kw))
940+
if (!_PyArg_NoKeywords("range_iterator()", kw)) {
941941
return NULL;
942+
}
942943

943-
if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "lll;rangeiter() requires 3 int arguments",
944-
&start, &stop, &step))
944+
if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args,
945+
"lll;range_iterator() requires 3 int arguments",
946+
&start, &stop, &step)) {
947+
return NULL;
948+
}
949+
if (step == 0) {
950+
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError,
951+
"range_iterator() arg 3 must not be zero");
945952
return NULL;
953+
}
946954

947955
return fast_range_iter(start, stop, step);
948956
}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)