FAQ: Privacy Statement update on Copilot data use for model training (Free/Pro/Pro+) #188488
Replies: 109 comments 142 replies
-
|
Why not let people choose per project if they want to opt out? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The way to "proudly ask for consent" would be to require the user to opt-in instead of notifying them that this feature will be turned on at a future date, and thus requiring them to opt-out instead. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is not okay. Let users opt in an please let this AI fad die. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
At least offer a discount if we opting to benefit the models you sell. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
last announcements for copilot were horrible guys, just delete it to make us a favour if you continue like this |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you microslop, I hope you will train your shitty model with this comment :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
And still no ability to completely disable Copilot |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
As a new user to GitHub (sorta), I'm floored by this information. Can a mere person escape all this??? How do I opt out of all this? I think I've disabled most features Copilot has in my settings, but some say "Enabled", and I don't know how to turn them off. I hate this timeline, thanks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Dark pattern to not actually link to the page to update your settings in the email with instructions to disable it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
All these data and you still can't add a search feature to VSCode Copilot Chat |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Unless I'm not getting something, this is a complete and utter nothing burger of an answer. How does this address the question at all? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
At first please fix your bug..I cannot use my free quota, it does not reset. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Just because the whole industry is doing opt-in by default doesn't make it less shitty. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
missing Q: Why would anyone trust anything Microsoft says when the punishments for corpos violating user data privacy are nonexistent? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
If you’re excluding business customers from this, how is it that every user on our Business Plan has the “Allow GitHub to use my data for AI model training” option set to “Enabled” and has to actively opt out of it, just like any regular individual user? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I just wanna say is I believe in Ai and it's potential to be great. Its a great idea and a TERRIBLE one. Humans are totally gonna fuck this all up for everybody else. It's already too late now might as well improve or to our advantage. Anyway I can help out I will. I made some $$$ on the stock market with my AI. The least I can do is pay it forward anyway I can.to improve it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Just moved to forgejo, thanks for giving me the motivation. Everyone should do this its great |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I only have one question. How can I disable CoPilot completely? I don't like being forced into using something. I have disabled settings where I could, but CoPilot itself is still enabled. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I have a business account but I have only provided licenses to some of the developers. This means some of the developers might be on individual licenses. Does this change mean that:
I am confused as to how the individual paid licenses will behave for users within an org repo that has a business license. Please provide some clarity. Thanks |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
So unpaid private repos will be used for training? (when any context from Copilot on GitHub includes files from those repos) How then are those private repos still considered to be private? If I hired a human to work in my free private repo, their NDA will prevent them from spilling my code outside. But if I pay an AI to work in my free private repo, there's no such protection? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Tôi sẽ dẫn đến tận nơi bạn chỉ việc ở một trỗ
Vào Th 3, 7 thg 4, 2026 lúc 16:56 Liz Rice ***@***.***> đã
viết:
… Exactly this. I don't mind training when I'm working on public repos, but
"snippets" from private repos could easily include the parts that I want to
remain private. So I want at a minimum a toggle to allow public but not
private, and as @LLabmik <https://github.com/LLabmik> says additional
granularity might make it possible to enable other parts of the
interactions safely.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#188488 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/B7HACTJWDOBMNHMQA7WXH734UTGEVAVCNFSM6AAAAACWEXUUNOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTMNBXGQZTMNY>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***
com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
对于AI 有个无奈的建议,希望他知道偏离方向时,第一时间是修复过错而不是立马执行新的代码!明明一直走了一小段错误竟然会忽略,后进行新的,应该是先把错误修正在进行偏离纠正的!这个导致会产生很多错误和垃圾代码断阶代码一大堆!也就是按照中国成语说捡了芝麻,丢了西瓜! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Is all of their interaction data excluded, or only interactions that involve code inside a paid organization? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
can the data be shared anonymously and universally, rather than exclusively with microsoft ? Make all ai better. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The update could have been clearer, and the current settings wording is easy to misread. On the Copilot settings page, the control for “Allow GitHub to use my data for AI model training” uses text like “You won’t have access to the feature” when set to Disabled. Read at face value, that sounds like you might lose access to Copilot itself, rather than just opting out of data being used for training. It would help to make that distinction explicit. For example: “Disabling this will not affect your Copilot access; it only prevents your data from being used for AI model training.” It also wasn’t obvious where to find this setting from the blog post. I had to scroll through the Copilot settings page to locate it, so a clearer path in the post would help. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Is GitHub training on data in private repositories of free organizations? I do not see any setting to opt-out of it for a free organization. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Will "interaction data" that includes code snippets (or documentation, or configuration data, etc.) that is stored in local files that are part of To put it another way, would data from files that are part of a project locally, but not uploaded to GitHub outside of being included in a Copilot session, be kept by GitHub, and used for training? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.






Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello GitHub Community👋
We’re sharing an update to our Privacy Statement and Terms of Service about how we use personal data to develop, improve, and secure GitHub products and services, including training AI and machine learning models that power GitHub Copilot.
For the full announcement and complete details, please visit the blog post: Updates to GitHub Copilot interaction data usage policy.
Frequently Asked Questions
Below is an FAQ covering what’s changing, who’s affected, what data may be used (when enabled), safeguards, and opt-out instructions.
Why is GitHub making this change and when will it go into effect?
Why are you only using data from individuals while excluding businesses and enterprises?
Are students and teachers that access Copilot Pro for free affected by this update?
What data are you collecting?
What can individuals do if they don’t want their inputs, outputs, or code snippets, used for model training?
Who will have access to this data outside of GitHub?
What is a "GitHub affiliate" and who does that include?
Companies that provide AI models or other services to GitHub — such as model providers, cloud hosting vendors, and other service providers — are not affiliates. They are service providers or subprocessors, and they are bound by contractual obligations that restrict how they can use your data. Specifically, service providers and subprocessors may only process your data on GitHub's behalf and at GitHub's direction — they do not receive your data for their own independent purposes, including their own model training. You can see GitHub's current list of subprocessors here.
In short: affiliates are part of our corporate family. Service providers work for us under contract. These are distinct relationships with different rights and obligations.
How do you protect sensitive data?
Do I need to do anything if I previously disabled the setting titled "Enabling or disabling prompt and suggestion collection"?
Will code stored in private repositories be used for model training?
What safeguards are in place to prevent enterprise code being used for model training due to an individual using a personal Copilot license while working in their employer’s codebase?
Other companies aren’t using user data to train models. Why is GitHub?
You’re collecting code snippets, prompt text, AI responses, and detailed interaction patterns. How is this not giving you my entire codebase?
Security researchers found that Copilot Chat could expose private code from repositories that were temporarily public then set back to private. Why should we trust your guarantees about protecting our data?
I selected Copilot because GitHub said it didn’t train on user data. This feels like a bait and switch.
If this data collection is truly safe, why don’t you enable it by default for enterprise customers as well?
If your AI needs real user code to be competitive, isn’t that an admission that your advantage comes from exploiting your existing user base rather than better research?
If training on user code is so obviously beneficial, why does every company try to hide it behind toggles, footnotes, or tiered pricing instead of proudly asking for consent?
I noticed the private repository access language was removed from the Privacy Statement. Where did it go?
Join the discussion
Have additional questions or feedback? Please share them in the comments below.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions