Describe the issue:
generic unit in timedelta64 dtype is deprecated in the PR gh-29619, but np.timedelta64() do not raise DeprecationWarning when called.
This is same for np.datetime64(), which returns NaT without unit.
Current behavior:
np.timedelta64() # no warning, returns 0 timedelta with generic unit
np.datetime64() # no warning, returns NaT without unit
It might be good to set some specific unit such as "ns" as default unit.
I'd like to note @seberg 's comment here for reference.
Rethinking it, there some subtleties. I.e. np.array([np.timedelta64(3, "ns")], dtype="m") needs to keep working the way it currently does.
That is in principle not so hard, but in practice the path it currently takes is still np.dtype("m") -> unitless singleton -> type(uniteless singleton). But if np.dtype("m") there gives a warning, this conversion needs to happen later.
One thing I am not sure about is, if you were to change the default to ns for np.dtype("m") then some things might change behavior without a warning.
Reproduce the code example:
import numpy as np
np.timedelta64() # no warning, returns 0 timedelta with generic unit
np.datetime64() # no warning, returns NaT without unit
Error message:
Python and NumPy Versions:
2.5.0.dev0+git20260329.8568ed8
3.12.3 (main, Jul 12 2025, 11:14:50) [GCC 11.4.0]
Runtime Environment:
No response
How does this issue affect you or how did you find it:
This issue is reported and based on the discussion in gh-26919.
Describe the issue:
genericunit intimedelta64dtype is deprecated in the PR gh-29619, butnp.timedelta64()do not raiseDeprecationWarningwhen called.This is same for
np.datetime64(), which returnsNaTwithout unit.Current behavior:
It might be good to set some specific unit such as "ns" as default unit.
I'd like to note @seberg 's comment here for reference.
Reproduce the code example:
Error message:
Python and NumPy Versions:
2.5.0.dev0+git20260329.8568ed8
3.12.3 (main, Jul 12 2025, 11:14:50) [GCC 11.4.0]
Runtime Environment:
No response
How does this issue affect you or how did you find it:
This issue is reported and based on the discussion in gh-26919.