Version
16.17.0
Platform
Linux d0cd0f9c43d3 5.15.0-41-generic #44-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jun 22 14:20:53 UTC 2022 riscv64 riscv64 riscv64 GNU/Linux
Subsystem
No response
What steps will reproduce the bug?
$ ./configure && make
/deps/openssl/config -I../deps/openssl/config/archs/linux-x86_64/asm -I../deps/openssl/config/archs/linux-x86_64/asm/include -I../deps/openssl/config/archs/linux-x86_64/asm/crypto -I../deps/openssl/config/archs/linux-x86_64/asm/crypto/include/internal -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wa,--noexecstack -Wall -O3 -pthread -m64 -Wall -O3 -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-old-style-declaration -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -MMD -MF /node-16.17.0/out/Release/.deps//node-16.17.0/out/Release/obj.target/openssl/deps/openssl/openssl/ssl/bio_ssl.o.d.raw -c
cc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-m64'
make[1]: *** [deps/openssl/openssl.target.mk:871: /node-16.17.0/out/Release/obj.target/openssl/deps/openssl/openssl/ssl/bio_ssl.o] Error 1
make: *** [Makefile:113: node] Error 2
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
No response
What is the expected behavior?
No response
What do you see instead?
/deps/openssl/config -I../deps/openssl/config/archs/linux-x86_64/asm -I../deps/openssl/config/archs/linux-x86_64/asm/include -I../deps/openssl/config/archs/linux-x86_64/asm/crypto -I../deps/openssl/config/archs/linux-x86_64/asm/crypto/include/internal -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wa,--noexecstack -Wall -O3 -pthread -m64 -Wall -O3 -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-old-style-declaration -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -MMD -MF /node-16.17.0/out/Release/.deps//node-16.17.0/out/Release/obj.target/openssl/deps/openssl/openssl/ssl/bio_ssl.o.d.raw -c
cc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-m64'
make[1]: *** [deps/openssl/openssl.target.mk:871: /node-16.17.0/out/Release/obj.target/openssl/deps/openssl/openssl/ssl/bio_ssl.o] Error 1
make: *** [Makefile:113: node] Error 2
Additional information
Building node under the riscv64 architecture reported this problem, please help to see how to solve it?
Version
16.17.0
Platform
Linux d0cd0f9c43d3 5.15.0-41-generic #44-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jun 22 14:20:53 UTC 2022 riscv64 riscv64 riscv64 GNU/Linux
Subsystem
No response
What steps will reproduce the bug?
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
No response
What is the expected behavior?
No response
What do you see instead?
Additional information
Building node under the riscv64 architecture reported this problem, please help to see how to solve it?