doc: clarify fs.ReadStream and fs.WriteStream are not constructable

kovan · claude · marco-ippolito · commit 6ec9a70204d1 · 2026-05-11T16:16:22.000+02:00
Add explicit wording that fs.ReadStream and fs.WriteStream should not be constructed directly, matching the existing pattern used by fs.Stats ("not to be created directly using the new keyword"). The factory functions fs.createReadStream() and fs.createWriteStream() are the supported API. Fixes: #40546 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> PR-URL: #62208 Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
diff --git a/doc/api/fs.md b/doc/api/fs.md
@@ -7067,8 +7067,8 @@ added: v0.1.93
 
 * Extends: {stream.Readable}
 
-Instances of {fs.ReadStream} are created and returned using the
-[`fs.createReadStream()`][] function.
+Instances of {fs.ReadStream} cannot be constructed directly. They are created and
+returned using the [`fs.createReadStream()`][] function.
 
 #### Event: `'close'`
 
@@ -7656,8 +7656,8 @@ added: v0.1.93
 
 * Extends {stream.Writable}
 
-Instances of {fs.WriteStream} are created and returned using the
-[`fs.createWriteStream()`][] function.
+Instances of {fs.WriteStream} cannot be constructed directly. They are created and
+returned using the [`fs.createWriteStream()`][] function.
 
 #### Event: `'close'`
 
