License?

I noticed that the package.json now lists GPLv2 as the license. Any objection to switching to MIT?

I'd prefer MIT, must have been my bad when updating the package.json.

On 26/06/2013, at 2:52 AM, Tim Branyen notifications@github.com wrote:

I noticed that the package.json now lists GPLv2 as the license. Any object to switching to MIT?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

No worries, I'll update later unless someone beats me to it.

Navigation Menu