Skip to content

Sync and Async methods #16

Closed
Closed

Description

@tbranyen

Add support for synchronous methods, should be direct calls and suffixed with Sync

Activity

  1. ghost assigned on May 8, 2011
  2. milani commented on Aug 30, 2011

    @milani

    I need this support if you do :)

  3. tbranyen commented on Aug 30, 2011

    @tbranyen
    MemberAuthor

    Hey @milani, I think it should be relatively simple to implement this. I'd like to rethink how the bindings are currently written so that I can write the sync methods and then some syntactic sugar on top to make them async. This would greatly increase the turn over time for porting methods.

  4. faceleg commented on Mar 10, 2013

    @faceleg
    Collaborator

    @tbranyen did you ever get anywhere with this "sugar" approach? From what I've seen you aren't supposed to call V8 methods from different threads, which IMHO makes your suggestion unfeasible. Does this sound right to you, or am I missing something here?

  5. papandreou commented on Nov 11, 2013

    @papandreou
    Contributor

    I'm wondering why this was closed? I have a use case for synchronous variants of all the methods.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions