Skip to content

doc: add TC meeting minutes 2015-03-04#1123

Merged
rvagg merged 1 commit intonodejs:v1.xfrom
rvagg:tc-minutes-2015-03-04
Apr 1, 2015
Merged

doc: add TC meeting minutes 2015-03-04#1123
rvagg merged 1 commit intonodejs:v1.xfrom
rvagg:tc-minutes-2015-03-04

Conversation

@rvagg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rvagg rvagg commented Mar 11, 2015

original issue #1053

I did not attend this meeting and haven't had a chance to catch up on it so I'm trusting these minutes were recorded faithfully

EDIT: I attended but bailed early

Comment thread doc/tc-meetings/2015-03-04.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It has typo: 2015-03-04 :)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks, fixed!

@rvagg rvagg force-pushed the tc-minutes-2015-03-04 branch from 4391b1f to e137954 Compare March 11, 2015 16:34
Comment thread doc/tc-meetings/2015-03-04.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does this belong here?

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM otherwise, though I didn't review it from the recording.

@mscdex mscdex added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Mar 25, 2015
PR-URL: nodejs#1123
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
@rvagg rvagg force-pushed the tc-minutes-2015-03-04 branch from e137954 to 634e962 Compare April 1, 2015 12:33
@rvagg rvagg merged commit 634e962 into nodejs:v1.x Apr 1, 2015
@rvagg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

rvagg commented Apr 1, 2015

landed @ 634e962

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants