Improve int test coverage

hauntsaninja · hauntsaninja · commit df988c198bd7 · 2023-04-30T16:23:22.000-07:00
Following discussion in https://discuss.python.org/t/bug-in-int-42/26360/5 This tests some of the things documented in python#100436
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_int.py b/Lib/test/test_int.py
@@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ def test_basic(self):
         self.assertEqual(int(' 0O123   ', 0), 83)
         self.assertEqual(int(' 0X123  ', 0), 291)
         self.assertEqual(int(' 0B100 ', 0), 4)
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            int('010', 0)
 
         # without base still base 10
         self.assertEqual(int('0123'), 123)
@@ -221,6 +223,22 @@ def test_basic(self):
         self.assertEqual(int('2br45qc', 35), 4294967297)
         self.assertEqual(int('1z141z5', 36), 4294967297)
 
+    def test_sign(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            int('+')
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            int('-')
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            int('- 1')
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            int('+ 1')
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            int(' + 1 ')
+
+    def test_unicode(self):
+        self.assertEqual(int("१२३४५६७८९०1234567890"), 12345678901234567890)
+        self.assertEqual(int('١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩٠'), 1234567890)
+
     def test_underscores(self):
         for lit in VALID_UNDERSCORE_LITERALS:
             if any(ch in lit for ch in '.eEjJ'):
