|
18 | 18 | ### General objectives, strategy going forward |
19 | 19 |
|
20 | 20 | * Olivia, Tierney: We should ensure that goals are long-term |
21 | | -* Adam: Rediscussing the points listed in https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/issues/1534 |
| 21 | +* Adam: Rediscussing the points listed in <https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/issues/1534> |
22 | 22 | * Adam: Site Structure, Design, Implementation |
23 | 23 | * Adam: In that order |
24 | 24 | * Olivia: Previous discussions have been too implementation-focused |
|
28 | 28 |
|
29 | 29 | ### Overall site structure |
30 | 30 |
|
31 | | -* See also https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/issues/1534 (Assess current site structure, see what's needed and what's not). |
| 31 | +* See also <https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/issues/1534> (Assess current site structure, see what's needed and what's not). |
32 | 32 |
|
33 | 33 | * Frederic: History of website. There never was a well defined content structure, it was made as needed. |
34 | 34 | * Jeremiah: brief notes on iojs.org's design |
|
40 | 40 | * Olivia: Suggestion to start. What do we have now, a sort of site map. Then go from there. |
41 | 41 | * Frederic: volunteers to write up a site map of the existing site (link) |
42 | 42 | * Tierney, Jeremiah: discussion of how the node api docs are maintained somewhat separate. |
43 | | -* Adam: Overview of his blog post write up which compares to other "competeting" websites in some detail: https://medium.com/the-node-js-collection/redesigning-nodejs-part-1-fac08a0e015a |
| 43 | +* Adam: Overview of his blog post write up which compares to other "competeting" websites in some detail: <https://medium.com/the-node-js-collection/redesigning-nodejs-part-1-fac08a0e015a> |
44 | 44 | * Fransisco: what are the main goals of the current website? |
45 | 45 | * Tierney: Primary uses of site to date: Downloads, information, Documentation, Getting involved. |
46 | 46 |
|
|
50 | 50 | * Frederic: I want to see the Code of Conduct, governance docs, etc, directly. Should be part of the website. |
51 | 51 | * Adam: I'd love to see some "Learn" page, a normal-language guided tour. Something more comprehensive and ergonomic. |
52 | 52 | * Adam: We may not need to write this content as it may already exist and we may be able to get it contributed back. |
53 | | -* Frederic: The getting started guides are currently at https://nodejs.org/en/docs/guides/getting-started-guide/, needs to be surfaced better. As does the introduction https://nodejs.org/en/about/. |
| 53 | +* Frederic: The getting started guides are currently at <https://nodejs.org/en/docs/guides/getting-started-guide/>, needs to be surfaced better. As does the introduction <https://nodejs.org/en/about/>. |
54 | 54 | * Adam: The site should feel more cohesive. |
55 | 55 | * Timothy: I don't really agree - have seen other examples where the docs and main site work for different purposes. |
56 | 56 | * Adam: Some things should probably look the same as the home page, e.g. the 'getting started'. |
|
66 | 66 |
|
67 | 67 | ### Decision structure (consensus, etc.) |
68 | 68 |
|
69 | | -* There is a Foundation marketing committee. Check with Greg (gwallace@linuxfoundation.org) |
| 69 | +* There is a Foundation marketing committee. Check with [Greg](mailto:gwallace@linuxfoundation.org) |
70 | 70 | * Tierney: I sit on that committee as part of my job, and it is a pretty open group. |
71 | 71 |
|
72 | 72 | * Discussion of existing consensus-seeking model, seems acceptable (lazy consensus). |
|
0 commit comments