-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
260 lines (205 loc) · 10.9 KB
/
classify-issue-severity.yml
File metadata and controls
260 lines (205 loc) · 10.9 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
# This workflow assists in evaluating the severity of incoming issues to help
# with triaging tickets. It uses AI analysis to classify issues into severity levels
# (s0-s4) when the 'triage-check' label is applied.
name: Classify Issue Severity
on:
issues:
types: [labeled]
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
issue_url:
description: "Issue URL to classify"
required: true
type: string
template_preset:
description: "Template preset to use"
required: false
default: ""
type: string
permissions:
contents: read
jobs:
classify-severity:
name: AI Severity Classification
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: |
(github.event.label.name == 'triage-check' || github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch')
timeout-minutes: 30
env:
CODER_URL: ${{ secrets.DOC_CHECK_CODER_URL }}
CODER_SESSION_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.DOC_CHECK_CODER_SESSION_TOKEN }}
permissions:
contents: read
issues: write
steps:
- name: Determine Issue Context
id: determine-context
env:
GITHUB_ACTOR: ${{ github.actor }}
GITHUB_EVENT_NAME: ${{ github.event_name }}
GITHUB_EVENT_ISSUE_HTML_URL: ${{ github.event.issue.html_url }}
GITHUB_EVENT_ISSUE_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.issue.number }}
GITHUB_EVENT_SENDER_ID: ${{ github.event.sender.id }}
GITHUB_EVENT_SENDER_LOGIN: ${{ github.event.sender.login }}
INPUTS_ISSUE_URL: ${{ inputs.issue_url }}
INPUTS_TEMPLATE_PRESET: ${{ inputs.template_preset || '' }}
GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
run: |
echo "Using template preset: ${INPUTS_TEMPLATE_PRESET}"
echo "template_preset=${INPUTS_TEMPLATE_PRESET}" >> "${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
# For workflow_dispatch, use the provided issue URL
if [[ "${GITHUB_EVENT_NAME}" == "workflow_dispatch" ]]; then
if ! GITHUB_USER_ID=$(gh api "users/${GITHUB_ACTOR}" --jq '.id'); then
echo "::error::Failed to get GitHub user ID for actor ${GITHUB_ACTOR}"
exit 1
fi
echo "Using workflow_dispatch actor: ${GITHUB_ACTOR} (ID: ${GITHUB_USER_ID})"
echo "github_user_id=${GITHUB_USER_ID}" >> "${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
echo "github_username=${GITHUB_ACTOR}" >> "${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
echo "Using issue URL: ${INPUTS_ISSUE_URL}"
echo "issue_url=${INPUTS_ISSUE_URL}" >> "${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
# Extract issue number from URL for later use
ISSUE_NUMBER=$(echo "${INPUTS_ISSUE_URL}" | grep -oP '(?<=issues/)\d+')
echo "issue_number=${ISSUE_NUMBER}" >> "${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
elif [[ "${GITHUB_EVENT_NAME}" == "issues" ]]; then
GITHUB_USER_ID=${GITHUB_EVENT_SENDER_ID}
echo "Using label adder: ${GITHUB_EVENT_SENDER_LOGIN} (ID: ${GITHUB_USER_ID})"
echo "github_user_id=${GITHUB_USER_ID}" >> "${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
echo "github_username=${GITHUB_EVENT_SENDER_LOGIN}" >> "${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
echo "Using issue URL: ${GITHUB_EVENT_ISSUE_HTML_URL}"
echo "issue_url=${GITHUB_EVENT_ISSUE_HTML_URL}" >> "${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
echo "issue_number=${GITHUB_EVENT_ISSUE_NUMBER}" >> "${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
else
echo "::error::Unsupported event type: ${GITHUB_EVENT_NAME}"
exit 1
fi
- name: Build Classification Prompt
id: build-prompt
env:
ISSUE_URL: ${{ steps.determine-context.outputs.issue_url }}
ISSUE_NUMBER: ${{ steps.determine-context.outputs.issue_number }}
GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
run: |
echo "Analyzing issue #${ISSUE_NUMBER}"
# Build task prompt - using unquoted heredoc so variables expand
TASK_PROMPT=$(cat <<EOF
You are an expert software engineer triaging customer-reported issues for Coder, a cloud development environment platform.
Your task is to carefully analyze issue #${ISSUE_NUMBER} and classify it into one of the following severity levels. **This requires deep reasoning and thoughtful analysis** - not just keyword matching.
Issue URL: ${ISSUE_URL}
WORKFLOW:
1. Use GitHub MCP tools to fetch the full issue details
Get the title, description, labels, and any comments that provide context
2. Read and understand the issue
What is the user reporting?
What are the symptoms?
What is the expected vs actual behavior?
3. Analyze using the framework below
Think deeply about each of the 5 analysis points
Don't just match keywords - reason about the actual impact
4. Classify the severity OR decline if insufficient information
5. Comment on the issue with your analysis
## Severity Level Definitions
- **s0**: Entire product and/or major feature (Tasks, Bridge, Boundaries, etc.) is broken in a way that makes it unusable for majority to all customers
- **s1**: Core feature is broken without a workaround for limited number of customers
- **s2**: Broken use cases or features with a workaround
- **s3**: Issues that impair usability, cause incorrect behavior in non-critical areas, or degrade the experience, but do not block core workflows
- **s4**: Bugs that confuse or annoy or are purely cosmetic, e.g. we don't plan on addressing them
## Analysis Framework
Customers often overstate the severity of issues. You need to read between the lines and assess the **actual impact** by reasoning through:
1. **What is actually broken?**
- Distinguish between what the customer *says* is broken vs. what is *actually* broken
- Is this a complete failure or a partial degradation?
- Does the error message or symptom indicate a critical vs. minor issue?
2. **How many users are affected?**
- Is this affecting all customers, many customers, or a specific edge case?
- Does the issue description suggest widespread impact or isolated incident?
- Are there environmental factors that limit the scope?
3. **Are there workarounds?**
- Can users accomplish their goal through an alternative path?
- Is there a manual process or configuration change that resolves it?
- Even if not mentioned, do you suspect a workaround exists?
4. **Does it block critical workflows?**
- Can users still perform their core job functions?
- Is this interrupting active development work or just an inconvenience?
- What is the business impact if this remains unresolved?
5. **What is the realistic urgency?**
- Does this need immediate attention or can it wait?
- Is this a regression or long-standing issue?
- What's the actual business risk?
## Insufficient Information Fail-Safe
**It is completely acceptable to not classify an issue if you lack sufficient information.**
If the issue description is too vague, missing critical details, or doesn't provide enough context to make a confident assessment, DO NOT force a classification.
Common scenarios where you should decline to classify:
- Issue has no description or minimal details
- Unclear what feature/component is affected
- No reproduction steps or error messages provided
- Ambiguous whether it's a bug, feature request, or question
- Missing information about user impact or frequency
## Comment Format
Use ONE of these two formats when commenting on the issue:
### Format 1: Confident Classification
## 🤖 Automated Severity Classification
**Recommended Severity:** \`S0\` | \`S1\` | \`S2\` | \`S3\` | \`S4\`
**Analysis:**
[2-3 sentences explaining your reasoning - focus on the actual impact, not just symptoms. Explain why you chose this severity level over others.]
---
*This classification was performed by AI analysis. Please review and adjust if needed.*
### Format 2: Insufficient Information
## 🤖 Automated Severity Classification
**Status:** Unable to classify - insufficient information
**Reasoning:**
[2-3 sentences explaining what critical information is missing and why it's needed to determine severity.]
**Suggested next steps:**
- [Specific information point 1]
- [Specific information point 2]
- [Specific information point 3]
---
*This classification was performed by AI analysis. Please provide the requested information for proper severity assessment.*
EOF
)
# Output the prompt
{
echo "task_prompt<<EOFOUTPUT"
echo "${TASK_PROMPT}"
echo "EOFOUTPUT"
} >> "${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
- name: Checkout create-task-action
uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd # v6.0.2
with:
fetch-depth: 1
path: ./.github/actions/create-task-action
persist-credentials: false
ref: main
repository: coder/create-task-action
- name: Create Coder Task for Severity Classification
id: create_task
uses: ./.github/actions/create-task-action
with:
coder-url: ${{ secrets.DOC_CHECK_CODER_URL }}
coder-token: ${{ secrets.DOC_CHECK_CODER_SESSION_TOKEN }}
coder-organization: "default"
coder-template-name: coder
coder-template-preset: ${{ steps.determine-context.outputs.template_preset }}
coder-task-name-prefix: severity-classification
coder-task-prompt: ${{ steps.build-prompt.outputs.task_prompt }}
github-user-id: ${{ steps.determine-context.outputs.github_user_id }}
github-token: ${{ github.token }}
github-issue-url: ${{ steps.determine-context.outputs.issue_url }}
comment-on-issue: true
- name: Write outputs
env:
TASK_CREATED: ${{ steps.create_task.outputs.task-created }}
TASK_NAME: ${{ steps.create_task.outputs.task-name }}
TASK_URL: ${{ steps.create_task.outputs.task-url }}
ISSUE_URL: ${{ steps.determine-context.outputs.issue_url }}
run: |
{
echo "## Severity Classification Task"
echo ""
echo "**Issue:** ${ISSUE_URL}"
echo "**Task created:** ${TASK_CREATED}"
echo "**Task name:** ${TASK_NAME}"
echo "**Task URL:** ${TASK_URL}"
echo ""
echo "The Coder task is analyzing the issue and will comment with severity classification."
} >> "${GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY}"